Literature DB >> 7975288

Two simple psychophysical methods for determining the optical modulation transfer function of the human eye.

J Rovamo1, J Mustonen, R Näsänen.   

Abstract

The foveal optical modulation transfer function (OMTF) of the human eye for a pupil 8 mm in diameter was determined at 1-23 c/deg by using two new methods. The first method was based on the comparison of the effects of quantal and added spatial noise on grating contrast sensitivity at each spatial frequency. The rationale behind the comparison is the fact that quantal noise is not affected by the OMTF of the human eye, because individual quanta cannot be blurred by the point spread function of ocular optics. In the second method we measured spatial contrast sensitivity for gratings whose area decreased but illuminance increased in proportion to spatial frequency squared. For such gratings the variation of contrast sensitivity with spatial frequency (f > or = 0.5 c/deg) is solely due to the OMTF of the human eye, because the effects of grating area and retinal illuminance (quantal noise) on contrast sensitivity are independent of spatial frequency. The two methods provided identical OMTFs. The foveal optical modulation transfer function of the human eye for an 8 mm pupil was found to be OMTF = [1 + (f/11.1)2.5]-1, where f refers to spatial frequency in c/deg. The equation means that the OMTF is constant at low spatial frequencies, becomes reduced to 50% at 11.1 c/deg and decreases thereafter with a slope of -2.5 when plotted in double logarithmic coordinates. At 1-16 c/deg our OMTF showed less image degradation than any foveal OMTF of the human eye for 6-8 mm pupils reported so far in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7975288     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90234-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of the optical quality by determining the modulation transfer function for anterior corneal surface in myopes.

Authors:  Yan-Zhen Zheng; Yan-Peng Chen; Yan Qiu; Guo-Guang Zhai; Yao-Yu Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Transparency of the bovine corneal stroma at physiological hydration and its dependence on concentration of the ambient anion.

Authors:  Oksana Kostyuk; Oksana Nalovina; Turki M Mubard; Justyn W Regini; Keith M Meek; Andrew J Quantock; Gerald F Elliott; Stuart A Hodson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Comparison of the Optical Quality between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser LASIK.

Authors:  Ying Jin; Yan Wang; Lulu Xu; Tong Zuo; Hua Li; Rui Dou; Jiamei Zhang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Internal noise sources limiting contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Daphné Silvestre; Angelo Arleo; Rémy Allard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.