Literature DB >> 7974711

Activation of intragraft endothelial and mononuclear cells during discordant xenograft rejection.

M L Blakely1, W J Van der Werf, M C Berndt, A P Dalmasso, F H Bach, W W Hancock.   

Abstract

Most studies of discordant xenograft rejection have focused on the roles of recipient xenoreactive antibody and complement as mediators of hyperacute rejection; there are essentially no data from in vivo studies as to the contribution of endothelial cell responses to the pathobiology of xenograft rejection. We hypothesized that the mechanism by which xenoreactive natural antibodies and complement of the recipient are involved in rejection of a discordant, immediately vascularized xenograft involves donor organ endothelial cell activation, with the consequences of such activation contributing significantly to the rejection process. We performed a kinetic analysis of rejection of guinea pig hearts by untreated Lewis rats or recipients depleted of complement activity that underwent delayed xenograft rejection. We report that in both hyperacute rejection and delayed xenograft rejection there is widespread evidence of endothelial cell activation, including expression of P-selectin and E-selectin, upregulation of tissue factor, and downregulation of thrombomodulin and antithrombin III expression. Many of these changes occur very early posttransplantation in grafts that are not completely rejected until approximately 3 days. In delayed xenograft rejection, an intense cellular infiltrate is seen that results from progressive accumulation of activated macrophages and natural killer cells. T cell receptor alpha/beta+T cells are present only at relatively low levels. This cellular infiltrate is associated with dense expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon gamma, interleukin 1, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. We conclude that both endothelial cell activation and infiltration by activated macrophages and natural killer cells may play an important role in xenograft rejection. These newly described features of the xenogeneic rejection response may require targeting by future therapeutic regimens aimed at prolonging xenograft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7974711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  20 in total

Review 1.  Xenotransplantation--2000.

Authors:  M J Goddard; J E Foweraker; J Wallwork
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Modulation of nucleoside [correction of nucleotide] triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1 (NTPDase-1)cd39 in xenograft rejection.

Authors:  M Imai; K Takigami; O Guckelberger; K Enjyoji; R N Smith; Y Lin; E Csizmadia; J Sévigny; R D Rosenberg; F H Bach; S C Robson
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.354

3.  Recipient tissue factor expression is associated with consumptive coagulopathy in pig-to-primate kidney xenotransplantation.

Authors:  C C Lin; M Ezzelarab; R Shapiro; B Ekser; C Long; H Hara; G Echeverri; C Torres; H Watanabe; D Ayares; A Dorling; D K C Cooper
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Cryopreservation of the tracheal grafts: Review and perspective.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakanishi
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 5.  Recent advances in the immunology of xenotransplantation.

Authors:  T Takahashi; S Saadi; J L Platt
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 6.  NK cells after transplantation: friend or foe.

Authors:  Uzi Hadad; Olivia Martinez; Sheri M Krams
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.829

7.  Transgenic expression of human CD47 markedly increases engraftment in a murine model of pig-to-human hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  A Tena; J Kurtz; D A Leonard; J R Dobrinsky; S L Terlouw; N Mtango; J Verstegen; S Germana; C Mallard; J S Arn; D H Sachs; R J Hawley
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Current status of animal-to-human transplantation.

Authors:  Robert Zhong; Jeffrey L Platt
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.388

9.  Activation of naive xenogeneic but not allogeneic endothelial cells by human naive neutrophils: a potential occult barrier to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  F al-Mohanna; K Collison; R Parhar; A Kwaasi; B Meyer; S Saleh; S Allen; S al-Sedairy; D Stern; M Yacoub
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Thrombomodulin improves early outcomes after intraportal islet transplantation.

Authors:  W Cui; J T Wilson; J Wen; J Angsana; Z Qu; C A Haller; E L Chaikof
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.