Literature DB >> 7974578

Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors.

M E Segal1, R R Schall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Determining the functional/health status of stroke survivors poses special difficulties because of cognitive impairments that frequently result from stroke. A possible means of assessing the status of stroke survivors who are cognitively impaired is getting proxy responses from a family member or other caregiver. Proxy agreement was evaluated for two measures of functional/health status, the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) and the Health Status Questionnaire (HSQ), and a measure of disability, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
METHODS: Thirty-eight stroke survivors were administered the measures at follow-up (median time since the stroke, 6 months). Caregivers were instructed to answer as proxies for the stroke survivors in their care. Demographics on age, sex, race, marital status, educational level, side of lesion, and relation of stroke survivor to caregiver were collected.
RESULTS: Proxy agreement was excellent for the FAI (intraclass correlation, .85) and the FIM (.87), but poor for the HSQ scales (average proxy agreement, .32). Patients' scores were low and positively skewed for the FAI but high and negatively skewed for the FIM. Although Spearman rho coefficients between the measures were fairly high for both stroke survivors and proxy respondents, the correlation of scores was substantially weaker when the group of less severely impaired survivors (as established by FIM ratings) was considered separately.
CONCLUSIONS: The FAI and the FIM are useful for assessing the functional/health status of stroke survivors because answers can be obtained by proxy. Future studies should examine the relations between disability and functional/health status, with explicit attention paid to variations in the level of disability in the stroke survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7974578     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.25.12.2391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke.

Authors:  B A Golomb; B G Vickrey; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Sharon Barak; Pamela W Duncan
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2006-10

3.  Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39.

Authors:  Katerina Hilari; Sophie Owen; Sharon Jane Farrelly
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Functional status and use of healthcare facilities in long-term survivors of transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  I van Wijk; E Lindeman; L J Kappelle; J van Gijn; P J Koudstaal; J W Gorter; A Algra
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage (ATACH) II: design, methods, and rationale.

Authors:  A I Qureshi; Y Y Palesch
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Quality of life of stroke survivors.

Authors:  P Kim; S Warren; H Madill; M Hadley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Geriatric rehabilitation of stroke patients in nursing homes: a study protocol.

Authors:  Monica Spruit-van Eijk; Bianca I Buijck; Sytse U Zuidema; Frans L M Voncken; Alexander C H Geurts; Raymond T C M Koopmans
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 8.  Self-management: a systematic review of outcome measures adopted in self-management interventions for stroke.

Authors:  Emma J Boger; Sara Demain; Sue Latter
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.033

9.  Hierarchy of Dysfunction Related to Dressing Performance in Stroke Patients: A Path Analysis Study.

Authors:  Takaaki Fujita; Hirofumi Nagayama; Atsushi Sato; Yuichi Yamamoto; Kazuhiro Yamane; Koji Otsuki; Kenji Tsuchiya; Fusae Tozato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A multi-faceted knowledge translation approach to support persons with stroke and cognitive impairment: evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Sara E McEwen; Michelle Donald; Deirdre Dawson; Mary Y Egan; Anne Hunt; Sylvia Quant; Sharron Runions; Elizabeth Linkewich
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.