Literature DB >> 7974103

The value of in vitro ultrasonography in the intraoperative staging of gastric cancer. Blind study of 93 cases.

G de Manzoni1, A Macrì, G Borzellino, G Cordiano.   

Abstract

The correct staging is of crucial importance in the choice of surgical treatment in patients affected by stomach carcinoma. In an attempt to achieve a greater accuracy in the diagnosis of depth of tumor invasion, we propose to perform ultrasonography of the gastric wall during surgery (in vitro ultrasonography). Immediately after removal by the surgeon, the portion of the stomach containing the tumor is submitted to ultrasonography with a linear 7.5-MHz probe. To obtain good ultrasonographic images it was necessary to interpose an echo-free standoff pad between the probe and the gastric wall and between the latter and support surface. On completion of ultrasonography, the surgical specimen was sent to the pathologist, who was unaware of the diagnosis formulated on the basis of in vitro ultrasonography (VUS). The VUS diagnosis of T corresponded to the pathological diagnosis in 87/93 cases (93.5% accuracy). In the early cancers the diagnosis was correct in 24/28 cases (85.7%); in the advanced cancers the diagnosis was correct in 63/65 cases (96.9%). In comparison with the results of the other preoperative and intraoperative techniques the accuracy of in vitro ultrasonography in diagnosing the depth of tumor invasion was clearly superior. We feel that VUS may become a basic instrument in T staging and an aid to the surgeon in deciding the extent of the resection and of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7974103     DOI: 10.1007/BF00593437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative staging of gastrointestinal tumors by endosonography.

Authors:  K Ziegler; C Sanft; M Zeitz; E O Riecken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The value of operative ultrasonography in diagnosing tumor extension of carcinoma of the stomach.

Authors:  I Kodama; J Machi; M Tanaka; C Yoshida; K Hashimoto; J Takeda; T Kakegawa; B Sigel
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992-06

3.  The sonographic appearance of the normal gastric wall: an in vitro study.

Authors:  L Bolondi; P Casanova; V Santi; G Caletti; L Barbara; G Labò
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  The detection of gastric and esophageal tumor extension by high-resolution ultrasound during surgery.

Authors:  J Machi; J Takeda; T Kakegawa; H Yamana; H Fujita; T Kurohiji; Y Yamashita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Part I. Clinical classification.

Authors:  T Kajitani
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1981-03

6.  Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus surgical staging.

Authors:  S K Sussman; R A Halvorsen; F F Illescas; R H Cohan; M Saeed; P M Silverman; W M Thompson; W C Meyers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Fundamentals of endoscopic laser therapy (ELT) for G.I. tumors--new aspects with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

Authors:  K Yasuda; K Kiyota; M Nakajima; K Kawai
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  [Ultrasonoendoscopy: its indications in esophageal and gastric pathology].

Authors:  P J Valette; J C Souquet; R Lambert; P Bret
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1988-04

9.  Ultrasonographic findings in gastric cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Y Miyamoto; M Nakatani; M Ida; T Ishikawa; N Okazawa; M Ariizumi; F Tsujimoto; K Mizunuma; Y Fukuda; S Tada
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 0.910

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.