Literature DB >> 7973756

Bone scintigraphy and multimodality imaging in bone neoplasia: strategies for imaging in the new health care climate.

S J Pomeranz1, H T Pretorius, P S Ramsingh.   

Abstract

The integration of multiple imaging modalities in the assessment of musculoskeletal neoplasia is complex. Although no two instances are identical, certain guidelines can be gleaned from our experience as well as that reported in the literature. Assessment of most soft tissue masses is best carried forth with a combination of conventional radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Screening skeletal scintigraphy without localizing symptomatology that includes axial and appendicular skeleton is best carried out initially with bone scintigraphy. Screening the axial skeleton in the presence of clinical symptomatology or a strong suspicion of axial skeletal metastases or pathology is best implemented as a total spine screening examination with MRI and specialized pulsing sequences. Computed tomography is reserved primarily for assessment of cortical and juxtacortical lesions, fracture fragment positioning and/or configuration, and characterization of lesion matrix calcification or ossification when conventional radiographs are indeterminate. Although physical examination and conventional radiography still remain the initial medical algorithms used to evaluate possible musculoskeletal neoplasia, primary skeletal tumors may require multimodality imaging to segregate aggressive and nonaggressive processes. In this multimodality scenario, bone scintigraphy has a critical role in assisting with differentiation between malignant and benign neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7973756     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(05)80010-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  7 in total

1.  Bone scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Morteímans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Radiological diagnosis of skeletal metastases.

Authors:  V Söderlund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Three- to five-dimensional biomedical multisensor imaging for the assessment of neurological (dys) function.

Authors:  L M Bidaut; R Pascual-Marqui; J Delavelle; A Naimi; M Seeck; C Michel; D Slosman; O Ratib; D Ruefenacht; T Landis; N de Tribolet; J R Scherrer; F Terrier
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Single photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Zhao; Lin Li; Fanglan Li; Lixia Zhao
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Cervical squamous cell carcinoma with isolated tibial metastasis: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fang Yuan; Chunmei Zhang; Zhumei Cui; Xiang Li; Xia Li; Wei Lin; Xingsheng Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  18F-Labeled NaF PET-CT in Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Preoperative Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Liangjun Rao; Zhen Zong; Zhifeng Chen; Xiaoyan Wang; Xinchong Shi; Chang Yi; Xiangsong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  SPECT/CT in the Evaluation of Suspected Skeletal Pathology.

Authors:  Bhasker Rao Koppula; Kathryn A Morton; Ragheed Al-Dulaimi; Gabriel C Fine; Nikolas M Damme; Richard K J Brown
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-10-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.