Literature DB >> 7973480

No effect of low power laser in lateral epicondylitis.

M Krasheninnikoff1, N Ellitsgaard, B Rogvi-Hansen, A Zeuthen, K Harder, R Larsen, H Gaardbo.   

Abstract

Thirty-six patients with lateral epicondylitis of the elbow (19 women, 17 men, median age 48 yrs) were treated either with active laser or placebo, 18 patients in each group. The active laser was a GA-AL-AS 30 mW/830 nm low power laser (LPL). The study design was double blind and randomized. The treatment session consisted of eight treatments, two per week. Patients were irradiated on tender points on the lateral epicondyle and in the forearm extensors. Output power was 3,6 J/point. A follow up was performed by telephone, 10 weeks after the last treatment. No difference between laser and placebo was found on lateral elbow pain (Mann Whitney test, 95% confidence limits). We conclude that low power laser offers no advantage over placebo in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain as lateral epicondylitis. Further studies with low power laser treatment of musculoskeletal pain seem useless.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7973480     DOI: 10.3109/03009749409103726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0300-9742            Impact factor:   3.641


  12 in total

1.  Effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in lateral epicondylitis.

Authors:  Kaan Uzunca; Murat Birtane; Nurettin Taştekin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia.

Authors:  L Bisset; A Paungmali; B Vicenzino; E Beller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  [Evidence for laser acupuncture in cases of orthopedic diseases : a systematic review].

Authors:  B K Schüller; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 4.  Optimal case definitions of upper extremity disorder for use in the clinical treatment and referral of patients.

Authors:  Keith T Palmer; E Clare Harris; Cathy Linaker; Georgia Ntani; Cyrus Cooper; David Coggon
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 5.  Non-surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Susan E G Sims; Katherine Miller; John C Elfar; Warren C Hammert
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-12

6.  Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy and splinting in lateral epicondylitis; a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Umit Dundar; Utku Turkmen; Hasan Toktas; Alper Murat Ulasli; Ozlem Solak
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Treatment of tendinopathy: what works, what does not, and what is on the horizon.

Authors:  Brett M Andres; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effect of low-level laser therapy in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis: a single-blinded randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Ahmad Alghadir; Mohammed Taher Ahmed Omar; Abeer Bashier Al-Askar; Naser Khwietm Al-Muteri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Effectiveness of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET): an umbrella review.

Authors:  Ioannis Mamais; Konstantinos Papadopoulos; Demetris Lamnisos; Demetrios Stasinopoulos
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-09-30

10.  Blinding techniques in randomized controlled trials of laser therapy: an overview and possible solution.

Authors:  Ian Relf; Roberta Chow; Marie Pirotta
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.