Literature DB >> 7973431

Contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and computer assistance to diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction. A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain.

M Eskelinen1, J Ikonen, P Lipponen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of acute small-bowel studied in connection with the survey of acute abdominal pain by the Research Committee of the World Organization of Gastroenterology (OMGE). Criteria for inclusion and the diagnostic criteria of this prospective study were those set out by the OMGE Research Committee.
METHODS: The clinical findings in each patient were recorded in detail on a pre-defined structured data collection sheet, and the collected data were compared with the final diagnosis of patients.
RESULTS: The most efficient symptoms in the diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction were previous abdominal surgery (relative risk (RR) = 12.1) and type of pain (colic/intermittent versus steady) (RR = 2.4). The most efficient clinical tests were abdominal distension (yes versus no) (RR = 13.1) and bowel sounds (abnormal versus normal) (RR = 9.0). The sensitivity of the clinical decision was 0.75, with a specificity of 0.99 and an efficiency of 0.98. The computer-based diagnostic score reached a sensitivity of 0.87 with a specificity of 0.95 and an efficiency of 0.95.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute abdominal pain with distension, abnormal bowel sounds, and previous abdominal surgery are indicative of a small-bowel obstruction. A computer-based diagnostic score increases the sensitivity and usefulness index of the diagnosis of acute small-bowel obstruction in comparison with clinical decision alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7973431     DOI: 10.3109/00365529409092499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  14 in total

Review 1.  A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR).

Authors:  M S Wilson; H Ellis; D Menzies; B J Moran; M C Parker; J N Thompson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Accuracy of abdominal auscultation for bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Birger Michael Breum; Bo Rud; Thomas Kirkegaard; Tyge Nordentoft
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The Practice Guidelines for Primary Care of Acute Abdomen 2015.

Authors:  Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Susumu Tazuma; Akira Furukawa; Osamu Nishii; Kunihiro Shigematsu; Takeo Azuhata; Atsuo Itakura; Seiji Kamei; Hiroshi Kondo; Shigenobu Maeda; Hiroshi Mihara; Masafumi Mizooka; Toshihiko Nishidate; Hideaki Obara; Norio Sato; Yuichi Takayama; Tomoyuki Tsujikawa; Tomoyuki Fujii; Tetsuro Miyata; Izumi Maruyama; Hiroshi Honda; Koichi Hirata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Etiologies and outcomes of emergency surgery for acute abdominal pain: an audit of 1456 cases in a single center.

Authors:  Yuichi Takayama; Yuji Kaneoka; Atsuyuki Maeda; Yasuyuki Fukami; Takamasa Takahashi; Masahito Uji
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Challenges in diagnosing adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Thijs R van Oudheusden; Bart Ac Aerts; Ignace Hjt de Hingh; Misha Dp Luyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Small bowel obstruction due to postoperative adhesions: treatment patterns and associated costs in 110 hospital admissions.

Authors:  D Menzies; M Parker; R Hoare; A Knight
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Adhesive small bowel adhesions obstruction: Evolutions in diagnosis, management and prevention.

Authors:  Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Federico Coccolini; Luca Ansaloni; Belinda De Simone; Massimo Sartelli; Harry Van Goor
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-03-27

8.  Leucocyte Count Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Performance of a Diagnostic Score (DS) in Distinguishing Acute Appendicitis (AA) from Nonspecific Abdominal Pain (NSAP).

Authors:  Jannica Meklin; Maaret Eskelinen; Kari Syrjanen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Gender-specific Performance of a Diagnostic Score in Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Jannica Meklin; Maaret Eskelinen; Kari SyrjÄnen; Matti Eskelinen
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Alvarado, Eskelinen, Ohhmann and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis scores for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Hasan Erdem; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Koray Daş; Enver Reyhan; Cumhur Değer; Mehmet Aziret; Hilmi Bozkurt; Selçuk Uzun; Selim Sözen; Oktay İrkörücü
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.