Literature DB >> 7972952

Human interindividual variability--a major source of uncertainty in assessing risks for noncancer health effects.

D Hattis1, K Silver.   

Abstract

For noncancer effects, the degree of human interindividual variability plays a central role in determining the risk that can be expected at low exposures. This discussion reviews available data on observations of interindividual variability in (a) breathing rates, based on observations in British coal miners; (b) systemic pharmacokinetic parameters, based on studies of a number of drugs; (c) susceptibility to neurological effects from fetal exposure to methyl mercury, based on observations of the incidence of effects in relation to hair mercury levels; and (d) chronic lung function changes in relation to long-term exposure to cigarette smoke. The quantitative ranges of predictions that follow from uncertainties in estimates of interindividual variability in susceptibility are illustrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972952     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of occupational exposure: comparison of biological and environmental variabilities using physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling.

Authors:  G Truchon; R Tardif; G Charest-Tardif; A de Batz; P O Droz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Risk assessment for neurobehavioral toxicity: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  D Hattis; J Glowa; H Tilson; B Ulbrich
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  The challenge of mechanism-based modeling in risk assessment for neurobehavioral end points.

Authors:  D Hattis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model of trichloroethylene and its metabolites for use in risk assessment.

Authors:  H J Clewell; P R Gentry; T R Covington; J M Gearhart
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Systems Biology and Biomarkers of Early Effects for Occupational Exposure Limit Setting.

Authors:  D Gayle DeBord; Lyle Burgoon; Stephen W Edwards; Lynne T Haber; M Helen Kanitz; Eileen Kuempel; Russell S Thomas; Berran Yucesoy
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Distributions for time, interspecies and intraspecies extrapolation for deriving occupational exposure limits.

Authors:  Marco Dilger; Klaus Schneider; Claudia Drossard; Heidi Ott; Eva Kaiser
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.628

7.  Advances in Inhalation Dosimetry Models and Methods for Occupational Risk Assessment and Exposure Limit Derivation.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Lisa M Sweeney; John B Morris; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 8.  Dispelling urban myths about default uncertainty factors in chemical risk assessment--sufficient protection against mixture effects?

Authors:  Olwenn V Martin; Scholze Martin; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.