Literature DB >> 7972824

Women's attitudes about receiving mammographic results directly from radiologists.

S Liu1, L W Bassett, J Sayre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To learn what women think about the communication of mammographic results directly to them by radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred seven women completed a survey at the time of mammographic examination. The women were asked to indicate the strength of their agreement with seven statements about the communication of mammographic results directly to them by the radiologist.
RESULTS: The majority agreed that the radiologist should give them normal (286 women [93%]) or abnormal (277 women [90%]) results directly on site. They also agreed that the radiologist should send a report written in lay language of normal (268 women [87%]) or abnormal (280 women [91%]) results directly to them and that the radiologist should inform them of recommendations for short-term follow-up examinations (93%) and monitor their compliance (88%).
CONCLUSION: Because these results reflect findings for only these patients, the authors suggest that additional investigation be performed to determine what women in diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and geographic locations think about these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972824     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Doctor-patient communication in radiology: a great opportunity for future radiology.

Authors:  M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Direct reporting of laboratory test results to patients by mail to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  Sharon Sung; Valerie Forman-Hoffman; Mark C Wilson; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; S Polk; E Shtatland; J G Elmore; S W Fletcher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department.

Authors:  Jay Pahade; Corey Couto; Roger B Davis; Payal Patel; Bettina Siewert; Max P Rosen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  How often do patients ask for the results of their radiological studies?

Authors:  Enrico Capaccio; Andrea Podestà; Daniele Morcaldi; Maria Pia Sormani; Lorenzo Egildo Derchi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-01-28

6.  Doctor-patient relationship in oncologic radiology.

Authors:  L Ollivier; J Leclère; S Dolbeault; S Neuenschwander
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Patient experiences and preferences: development of practice guidelines in a cancer imaging department.

Authors:  L Ollivier; F Apiou; J Leclère; M Sévellec; B Asselain; A Brédart; S Neuenschwander
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.