PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment of epiphora due to acquired stenotic obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct system with dacryocystoplasty (DCP), in which balloon dilation is used to alleviate the obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (21 eyes) with epiphora due to obstructing lesions at the saccular or subsaccular level were treated with DCP. The authors used a catheter with a balloon diameter of only 3 mm to prevent damage to the nasolacrimal duct system and a nontraumatizing guide wire. Stent placement was not considered necessary. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 70 weeks. RESULTS: Cannulation was not possible in one case of complete obstruction. DCP was successfully performed in the other 20 cases. In 18 of these cases (90%), results comparable with those of dacryocystorhinostomy were achieved. No side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: DCP is potentially the treatment of choice for epiphora due to acquired stenotic obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct system.
PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment of epiphora due to acquired stenotic obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct system with dacryocystoplasty (DCP), in which balloon dilation is used to alleviate the obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (21 eyes) with epiphora due to obstructing lesions at the saccular or subsaccular level were treated with DCP. The authors used a catheter with a balloon diameter of only 3 mm to prevent damage to the nasolacrimal duct system and a nontraumatizing guide wire. Stent placement was not considered necessary. Follow-up ranged from 14 to 70 weeks. RESULTS: Cannulation was not possible in one case of complete obstruction. DCP was successfully performed in the other 20 cases. In 18 of these cases (90%), results comparable with those of dacryocystorhinostomy were achieved. No side effects were observed. CONCLUSION:DCP is potentially the treatment of choice for epiphora due to acquired stenotic obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct system.
Authors: U Lachmund; D Ammann-Rauch; A Forrer; M Grob; C Petralli; L Remonda; T Roeren; K Wilhelm Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 1.059