Literature DB >> 7972757

Skeletal muscle contraction: analysis with use of velocity distributions from phase-contrast MR imaging.

J E Drace1, N J Pelc.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Velocity gradient data from phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were tested for the ability to calculate tensile strain and shear strain (deformation) during cyclical motion of skeletal muscle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Strain data were derived from in vitro and in vivo phase-contrast MR velocity maps. A motion phantom designed to cyclically compress and expand a specimen of skeletal muscle provided a standard of reference to validate deformation, translation, and rotation measurements. The authors studied anterior and posterior muscle compartments of the lower extremity in three healthy volunteers during ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion against various resistances and the forearms of five healthy volunteers during flexion and extension of the fingers.
RESULTS: The mean in vitro tracking error was 0.5 mm. The gastrocnemius muscle area in vivo changed 20% for both the minimum and maximum force conditions and therefore did not appear to be a good predictor of force.
CONCLUSION: Phase-contrast MR imaging provides quantitative data on muscle contraction and demonstrates that shear and tensile strain can be measured and separated from translation and rotation of muscle.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972757     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Combined diffusion and strain tensor MRI reveals a heterogeneous, planar pattern of strain development during isometric muscle contraction.

Authors:  Erin K Englund; Christopher P Elder; Qing Xu; Zhaohua Ding; Bruce M Damon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  A Magnetic Resonance-Compatible Loading Device for Dynamically Imaging Shortening and Lengthening Muscle Contraction Mechanics.

Authors:  Amy Silder; Christopher J Westphal; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 0.582

3.  Muscle velocity and inertial force from phase contrast MRI.

Authors:  Andrew L Wentland; Emily J McWalter; Saikat Pal; Scott L Delp; Garry E Gold
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Shear strain rate from phase contrast velocity encoded MRI: Application to study effects of aging in the medial gastrocnemius muscle.

Authors:  Usha Sinha; Vadim Malis; Robert Csapo; Marco Narici; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Compressed sensing velocity encoded phase contrast imaging: Monitoring skeletal muscle kinematics.

Authors:  Vadim Malis; Usha Sinha; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Dynamic MRI of plantar flexion: A comprehensive repeatability study of electrical stimulation-gated muscle contraction standardized on evoked force.

Authors:  Xeni Deligianni; Anna Hirschmann; Nicolas Place; Oliver Bieri; Francesco Santini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.