Literature DB >> 7972485

Abdominal surgery in patients with severe morbid obesity.

W E Matory1, J O'Sullivan, G Fudem, R Dunn.   

Abstract

At the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, from 1984 to 1992, we performed laparotomy or panniculectomy on 42 individuals weighing from 290 to 600 pounds, each with a height-weight index of over 55. All patients weighted more than 220 percent of ideal body weight. Follow-up ranged 8 to 52 months. All patients underwent panniculectomy except one. Pannus resection was performed by means of a large transverse ellipse. A suprapubic wedge resection often was used to minimize the discrepancy between the lengths of the upper and lower transverse incisions. With severe discrepancy, lateral V-flaps also were utilized to minimize the lateral dog-ear. To facilitate preparation, pannus exsanguination, and surgical resection, 10 to 12 towel clips or 4 to 5 large K-wires or Steinmann pins were passed through the central pannus. These were then suspended by rope from the overhead lighting. A two-team approach appears to have distinct advantages, including minimized blood loss, operative time, pulmonary compromise, and hospital stay. The technical difficulties of manipulating a large pannus were simplified by pannus suspension. Early preoperative involvement of the entire operative team, particularly the plastic surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the nursing staff, allows for proper evaluation of underlying medical problems and appropriately detailed anesthetic and surgical planning. Surgical management of the abdominal pannus in the morbidity obese patient in this series was performed with apparent clinical efficacy, reasonable safety, and long-term functional improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972485     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199412000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical properties of skin in massive weight loss patients.

Authors:  Shelly Choo; Guy Marti; Manuel Nastai; Jessie Mallalieu; Michele A Shermak
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Wound Healing Concepts in Clinical Practice of OMFS.

Authors:  Shruti Chhabra; Naveen Chhabra; Avneet Kaur; Niti Gupta
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-03-05

3.  Abdominoplasty after major weight loss: improvement of quality of life and psychological status.

Authors:  Calin Constantin Lazar; I Clerc; S Deneuve; I Auquit-Auckbur; P Y Milliez
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Dealing with the mass: a new approach to facilitate panniculectomy in patients with very large abdominal aprons.

Authors:  Matthias A Reichenberger; Alexander Stoff; Dirk F Richter
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Psychosocial impact of abdominoplasty.

Authors:  Kristina Stuerz; Hildegunde Piza; Klaus Niermann; Johann F Kinzl
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Abdominal lipectomy: a prospective outcomes study.

Authors:  Nadine B Semer; Wan C Ho; Sharrie Mills; Bm Rajashekara; Jason R Taylor; Nguyen B Trung; Henry Young; Juris Kivuls
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

7.  Abdominoplasty in the Massive Weight Loss Patient: Are Aesthetic Goals and Safety Mutually Exclusive?

Authors:  Richard J Restifo
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 8.  Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review.

Authors:  Yvonne N Pierpont; Trish Phuong Dinh; R Emerick Salas; Erika L Johnson; Terry G Wright; Martin C Robson; Wyatt G Payne
Journal:  ISRN Obes       Date:  2014-02-20

9.  Nanofat grafting under a split-thickness skin graft for problematic wound management.

Authors:  Cemal Alper Kemaloğlu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.