Literature DB >> 7972429

The effect of lasers, electrocautery, and sharp dissection on cutaneous flaps.

C L Gelman1, E G Barroso, C T Britton, M F Haklin, E D Staren.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the technical ease and wound-healing response of cutaneous flaps constructed on dogs using Nd:YAG laser, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and sharp dissection. Four flaps were constructed on the dorsum of 16 dogs using each of the four modalities. Parameters examined included drainage after both 48 hours and 1 week, time of dissection, bursting strength, and semiquantitative assessments of fibroblast, polymorphonuclear leukocyte, monocyte, and collagen content. Significantly less time was required to construct flaps with electrocautery as compared with CO2 laser, Nd:YAG laser, and sharp dissection (15 versus 18, 20, and 26 minutes, respectively; p < 0.01). Significantly fewer suture ligatures were necessary to obtain hemostasis for electrocautery, CO2 laser, and Nd:YAG laser as compared with sharp dissection (0, 2, and 2 versus 15 sutures, respectively; p < 0.01). Drainage was significantly less for flaps constructed using sharp dissection as compared with both CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers at 48 hours (12 versus 26 cc, p < 0.01, and 20 cc, p < 0.05, respectively). Significantly less drainage was observed after 48 hours for flaps created using electrocautery as compared with CO2 laser (14 versus 26 cc; p < 0.05). Bursting strength of flaps constructed using sharp dissection was significantly greater than that of those constructed using electrocautery, Nd:YAG laser, and CO2 laser (1086 versus 638 gm, p < 0.05, 714 gm, and 571 gm, p < 0.01, respectively). Semiquantitative histologic evaluation revealed a higher collagen content and fibroblast infiltration and less polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration in wounds created using sharp dissection as compared with CO2 laser, Nd:YAG laser, and electrocautery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7972429     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199411000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

1.  Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: use of 'finger port', a new approach.

Authors:  R Sinha; N Sharma
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Wound complications and clinical results of electrocautery versus a scalpel to create a cutaneous flap in thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Mehmet Uludag; Gurkan Yetkin; Alper Ozel; M Banu Yilmaz Ozguven; Senay Yener; Adnan Isgor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Longterm comparison of soft palate scars after UPPP made by CO(2), contact Nd-YAG or combined CO (2) and Nd-YAG laser beams.

Authors:  J Laranne; J Pukander; H Puhakka; I Rantala; A Harmoinen; P Holm
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Comparing scalpel, electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector effects: the impact on wound complications and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in wound fluid from mastectomy patients.

Authors:  Kerim Bora Yilmaz; Lutfi Dogan; Handan Nalbant; Melih Akinci; Niyazi Karaman; Cihangir Ozaslan; Hakan Kulacoglu
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.