Literature DB >> 7971134

Hand-movement profiles in a tactual-tactual matching task: effects of spatial factors and laterality.

J Fagot1, A Lacreuse, J Vauclair.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of spatial factors and hemispheric lateralization upon hand-scanning strategies in 14 right-handed men tested in a tactual-tactual matching task. The experiment involved comparisons (judgments of same or different) between two objects sequentially touched by the fingertips of the left or right hand. Stimuli were made of smoothly joined cubes whose junctions were not haptically discernible. Exploratory strategies were inferred from the durations and locations of hand contacts with any of the cubes composing the stimuli. Accuracy was greater when the same stimulus was touched twice by the same hand than when different hands were used to feel it. With regard to strategies, both hands touched the upper parts of the object longer than the lower parts. Subjects also inspected more portions of the objects ipsilateral to the hand used. Overall differences in time spent touching cubes were greater for the right hand than for the left hand, showing that touch times were less evenly distributed on object parts for the former than for the latter. In this study, the process of information gathering by touch appears to be determined by the intertwining integration of contextual factors (e.g., stimulus position in space), biomechanical constraints on hand movements, and such cognitive factors as hemispheric differences on the ability to encode spatial pattern information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7971134     DOI: 10.3758/bf03209768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  16 in total

1.  Observations on active touch.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Perceptual asymmetries in the somatosensory system: a dichhaptic experiment and critical review of the literature from 1929 to 1986.

Authors:  D C Summers; S J Lederman
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Early stages of tactual matching.

Authors:  S Millar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; O Koenig; A Barrett; C B Cave; J Tang; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Tactile perception of direction in normal subjects. Implications for hemispheric cerebral dominance.

Authors:  A L Benton; H S Levin; N R Varney
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Eye and hand: differential memory and its effect on matching.

Authors:  J J Goodnow
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Left hemispheric advantage for a visuopatial-dichaptic matching task.

Authors:  L Yandell; J W Elias
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  A theory of perceptual matching.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Influence of stimulus symmetry and complexity upon haptic scanning strategies during detection, learning, and recognition tasks.

Authors:  P J Locher; R W Simmons
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-02

10.  Identifying objects by touch: an "expert system".

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman; V A Metzger
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Color-object interference in young children: A Stroop effect in children 3½-6½ years old.

Authors:  Meredith B Prevor; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Haptic shape discrimination and interhemispheric communication.

Authors:  Catherine J Dowell; J Farley Norman; Jackie R Moment; Lindsey M Shain; Hideko F Norman; Flip Phillips; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The contributions of vision and haptics to reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

5.  Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.