Literature DB >> 7971132

Peripheral and foveal segmentation of angle textures.

C Meinecke1, L Kehrer.   

Abstract

Studies of the effects of retinal eccentricity on the visual segmentation of textures are presented. The textures used in these studies were composed of angle elements. These were presented tachistoscopically to college students in three different experiments. Results showed that there were different relationships between segmentation performance and eccentricity, depending on the width of the angles used in the background and target texture. One major difference was that peak performance was found in the fovea in some conditions, and in peripheral areas in other conditions. Performance in the fovea and the periphery seemed to be determined by qualitatively different features. It was assumed that an appropriate explanation is that the system-internal representation of a specific stimulus within the early visual system differs as a function of the retinal location at which it is projected. Thus, the critical features discriminating between target and background texture have to be sought in the system-internal representation of the stimulus instead of in the stimulus itself. The data show that a relatively exact system-internal representation of the stimulus is present in the fovea, where performance is determined by angle width. In the periphery, in contrast, angles seem to be represented as "blobs," and performance is determined by the orientation of the blobs' main axes.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7971132     DOI: 10.3758/bf03209766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  27 in total

1.  Early processing of visual information.

Authors:  D Marr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1976-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Differences between fovea and parafovea in visual search processes.

Authors:  A Fiorentini
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Central performance drop on perceptual segregation tasks.

Authors:  L Kehrer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1989

4.  Early vision and texture perception.

Authors:  J R Bergen; E H Adelson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Texture discrimination and the analysis of proximity.

Authors:  J Fox; J E Mayhew
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Visual conspicuity and selective background interference in eccentric vision.

Authors:  F L Engel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty.

Authors:  J Beck
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1972-03

8.  Visual search with color.

Authors:  R C Carter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Orientation sensitivity and texture segmentation in patterns with different line orientation.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Visual search through color displays: effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity.

Authors:  E W Farmer; R M Taylor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  On the flexibility of sustained attention and its effects on a texture segmentation task.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Barbara Montagna; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Flexible contextual modulation of naturalistic texture perception in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Daniel Herrera-Esposito; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Leonel Gomez-Sena
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.