Literature DB >> 7969872

A behavioral measure of hand preference as opposed to hand skill.

M P Bryden1, M Singh, R E Steenhuis, K L Clarkson.   

Abstract

Twenty-five self-professed left-handers and 21 self-professed right-handers were given a variety of performance tests to assess handedness, along with a preference inventory and a dichotic listening test of language lateralization. The performance tests included the Annett pegboard task, that Tapley and Bryden dot-filling tasks, and two procedures, the long pegboard and long dots tasks, that were intended to assess the point in space at which a particular unimanual movement became sufficiently awkward for one to shift to the other hand. All four of these performance tests differentiated between left-handers and right-handers, although the differences between handedness groups were somewhat larger when handedness was defined in terms of the preference inventory rather than on the basis of self-report. When the difference between preferred and non-preferred hands was examined, the best predictor of hand preference was the long pegboard task. Such a finding is consistent with the view that the long pegboard provides a behavioral measure of hand preference, while the pegs and dots tasks are more closely linked to specific skills. In addition, the correlations between individual preference items and the dichotic right-ear advantage suggest that language lateralization is related to rather different handedness measures than those usually used to define handedness. This finding would suggest that handedness and language lateralization are determined by somewhat different mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7969872     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90048-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Perceived reachability: the roles of handedness and hemifield.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sex differences in lateralisation of fine manual skills in children.

Authors:  A V Pedersen; H Sigmundsson; H T A Whiting; R P Ingvaldsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.

Authors:  Gautum A Srinivasan; Tarika Embar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasping with the eyes of your hands: hapsis and vision modulate hand preference.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selection.

Authors:  A Przybyla; C J Coelho; S Akpinar; S Kirazci; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Evolutionary origins of human handedness: evaluating contrasting hypotheses.

Authors:  Hélène Cochet; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children.

Authors:  Sara M Scharoun; Pamela J Bryden
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-18

9.  Hand and Grasp Selection in a Preferential Reaching Task: The Effects of Object Location, Orientation, and Task Intention.

Authors:  Sara M Scharoun; Kelly A Scanlan; Pamela J Bryden
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-16

10.  Associations between handedness and cerebral lateralisation for language: a comparison of three measures in children.

Authors:  Margriet A Groen; Andrew J O Whitehouse; Nicholas A Badcock; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.