Literature DB >> 7968326

The site of action of lidocaine in intravenous regional anesthesia.

Y Y Lai1, C L Chang, F C Yeh.   

Abstract

Despite vast clinical experience and success with intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA), the site and mode of action of the local anesthetic agents remains controversial. Many investigations have been published, but conclusions are variable. The principal site of action of lidocaine in IVRA was studied using 15 ASA I-II patients receiving surgical operation on the hands and forearms. A 22 gauge plastic cannula was inserted into the median cubital vein at the elbow. A double cuff tourniquet was secured on the upper arm, as described by Bier and modified by Homes. Another single tourniquet was then applied on the forearm as near the plastic catheter as possible. Two different concentrations of lidocaine (0.5% and 2%) in a total dose of 3 mg kg-1 was slowly injected into the vein via the catheter after the limb was exsanguinated and the tourniquets were inflated. The results showed that 0.5% lidocaine produced analgesia only on the intercuff area; there was no analgesic response noted on the forearm distal to the third tourniquet after a 15 minutes observation. However patients who received 2% lidocaine experienced in analgesia rapidly on the intercuff area and also slowly on the forearm and hand. The anesthesia developed from the fingertips upward. Based on this evidence, we concluded that the principal site of action of lidocaine in IVRA depends on concentration. The lower concentration acts on the sensory nerve endings and the small nerves. Whereas, the higher concentration acts on both nerve trunks and nerve endings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7968326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ma Zui Xue Za Zhi


  6 in total

1.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations in preventing pain on propofol injection.

Authors:  Kapil Chaudhary; Pramod Gupta; Anoop Raj Gogia
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Reduction of Propofol-Induced Pain through Pretreatment with Lidocaine and/or Flurbiprofen.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Fujii; Masahiro Nakayama
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Magnesium sulfate versus Lidocaine pretreatment for prevention of pain on etomidate injection: A randomized, double-blinded placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Safavi; Azim Honarmand; Ashraf Sadat Sahaf; Seyyed Mohammad Sahaf; Mohammadali Attari; Mahsa Payandeh; Alireza Iazdani; Nilofarsaddat Norian
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

4.  Prevention of propofol injection pain in children: a comparison of pretreatment with tramadol and propofol-lidocaine mixture.

Authors:  Hale Borazan; Osman Sahin; Ahmet Kececioglu; M Selcuk Uluer; Tayfun Et; Seref Otelcioglu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Single pretreatment of remifentanil may reduce pain after propofol and rocuronium injection in rapid sequence induction.

Authors:  Yoon Ji Choi; Han Seok Park; Han Lee; Seung Zhoo Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-11-16

6.  Comparison of the preventive effects of pretreatment of lidocaine with a tourniquet and a premixed injection of lidocaine on propofol-LCT/MCT injection pain.

Authors:  Hyo Jin Byon; Kil Woo Lee; Hee Yong Shim; Jang Ho Song; Jong Kwon Jung; Young Deog Cha; Doo Ik Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.