Literature DB >> 7967857

The relationship between glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

M Weinberger1, M S Kirkman, G P Samsa, P A Cowper, E A Shortliffe, D L Simel, J R Feussner.   

Abstract

The relationship between glycemic control and health-related quality of life was examined in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Within the context of a randomized controlled trial, 275 patients with NIDDM receiving primary care from a Veteran's Administration general medical clinic were enrolled and monitored for 1 year. Glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin levels) and health-related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item Health Survey [SF-36]) were assessed at baseline and at 1 year. Multivariate regression modeling using baseline and change scores during a 1-year period did not find a linear or curvilinear relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin and SF-36 scores (P = .15); this was true even after controlling for five covariates identified a priori (insulin use, number of diabetic complications, duration of diabetes, education, number of hyper-, or hypoglycemic episodes during the preceding month). Health services researchers and clinicians alike need to be aware that these two important outcomes may not be directly related. This lack of association could contribute to the high noncompliance rates observed among patients prescribed complex diabetic regimens. Unless patients perceive a benefit from following such regimens, good glycemic control may continue to be an elusive therapeutic goal, especially in patients with long-standing disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7967857     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199412000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  52 in total

1.  Quality of life among diabetic patients in Swedish primary health care and in the general population: comparison between 1992 and 1995.

Authors:  P E Wändell; B Brorsson; H Aberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II.

Authors:  G Samsa; D Edelman; M L Rothman; G R Williams; J Lipscomb; D Matchar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Self-Rated Health and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Race by Gender Differences.

Authors:  Shervin Assari; Maryam Moghani Lankarani; John D Piette; James E Aikens
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-08-04

4.  Performance of the RAND-12 and SF-12 summary scores in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Johnson; Sheri L Maddigan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Understanding the complex associations between patient-provider relationships, self-care behaviours, and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: a structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; Sumit R Majumdar; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Investigating correlates of health related quality of life in a low-income sample of patients with diabetes.

Authors:  F Camacho; R T Anderson; R A Bell; D C Goff; V Duren-Winfield; D D Doss; R Balkrishnan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Quality of life as an outcome measure.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Validation of the Malay version of Diabetes Quality of Life (DQOL) Questionnaire for Adult Population with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Mohamad Adam Bujang; Mastura Ismail; Nur Khairul Bariyyah Mohd Hatta; Siti Haslina Othman; Nurakmal Baharum; Siti Sara Mat Lazim
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-18

9.  The association of type 2 diabetes patient and spouse illness representations with their well-being: a dyadic approach.

Authors:  Georgia Dimitraki; Evangelos C Karademas
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-04

10.  Testing whether patients with diabetes and healthy people perceive the meaning of the items in the Persian version of the SF-36 questionnaire similarly: a differential item functioning analysis.

Authors:  Zahra Bagheri; Peyman Jafari; Marzieh Mahmoodi; Mohammad Hossein Dabbaghmanesh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.