Literature DB >> 7965969

Does audit improve DNR decision making?

K Stewart1, A Wagg, M Kinirons.   

Abstract

The use of 'do not resuscitate' (DNR) orders in hospitals has been the subject of considerable comment in both the medical and the lay press. Guidelines have been produced to help make DNR decisions but, as yet, there have been no published accounts of these in practice. We have used audit to accounts of these in practice. We have used audit to develop DNR policy in our hospital, and have reviewed practice after the introduction of guidelines. This led to early consultant involvement in making decisions in 55 of 80 patients (69%) who were assessed as DNR at the time of death or discharge, documentation of reasons for DNR in all 55 of these and documentation of discussion with nurses in 49 (89%). Consultants agreed with DNR decisions made by their juniors in 31 of 34 cases (91%) and changed 'for CPR' decisions to DNR in 24 of 108 (22%). We have demonstrated that audit is an appropriate way to change and develop practice in sensitive areas such as this.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Newham General Hospital (London)

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965969      PMCID: PMC5401050     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN: 0035-8819


  15 in total

1.  Closed-chest cardiac massage.

Authors:  W B KOUWENHOVEN; J R JUDE; G G KNICKERBOCKER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Ethics and communication in do-not-resuscitate orders.

Authors:  T Tomlinson; H Brody
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Resuscitation decisions in a general hospital.

Authors:  K Stewart; K Abel; G S Rai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-24

4.  Must we always use CPR?

Authors:  L J Blackhall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Thou shalt not strive officiously.

Authors:  R I Bayliss
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-11-13

7.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: chances of success.

Authors:  G C Hanson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-05

8.  Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. When do physicians talk with patients?

Authors:  S E Bedell; T L Delbanco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Survey of "do not resuscitate" orders in a district general hospital.

Authors:  E J Aarons; N J Beeching
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-12-14

10.  Exclusion from resuscitation.

Authors:  R M Keatinge
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly.

Authors:  K Stewart; K Cumming; A Wagg
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Improving the documentation and appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.

Authors:  K Stewart; A Wagg; M Kinirons
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Clinical audit on documentation of anticipatory "not for resuscitation" orders in a tertiary Australian teaching hospital.

Authors:  Naveen Sulakshan Salins; Wendy Jansen
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2011-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.