Literature DB >> 7965900

A randomized clinical trial of two basic removable partial denture designs. Part I: Comparisons of five-year success rates and periodontal health.

K K Kapur1, R Deupree, R J Dent, A L Hasse.   

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of two partial denture designs, one with I-bar (bar) and the other with circumferential retainers (circumferential), in 134 patients with Kennedy class I and class II edentulous conditions. A total of 30 partial dentures were considered failures, five because of abutment failures and 25 because of the lack of removable partial denture use for eating. The 5-year success rate of 71.3% for the circumferential design did not differ significantly from the 76.6% for the bar design (p > 0.05). There were no discernible changes in the nine periodontal health components of abutment teeth with either of the two designs after 60 months. The results indicate that the two designs do not differ significantly in terms of success rates, maintenance care, and effects on abutment teeth. A well-constructed removable partial denture of either design, supported by favorable abutments and accompanied by a regular recall program offers a satisfactory treatment modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965900     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90340-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  10 in total

1.  Case-control study on the survival of abutment teeth of partially dentate patients.

Authors:  K Stegelmann; M Dirheimer; E Ludwig; O Moldovan; H Rudolph; R G Luthardt; B A Just
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition.

Authors:  Elliot Abt; Alan B Carr; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ovidiu Moldovan; Heike Rudolph; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Clinical performance of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ovidiu Moldovan; Heike Rudolph; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  No clear evidence on the clinical performance of different removable prosthetic options in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Iman Aw Radi; Khaled Taha
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2017-12-22

6.  A Viable Treatment Alternative in Distal Extension Cases: A Case Report.

Authors:  Swetha Kukunoor; Ravindra C Savadi; K Venkata Krishnam Raju; Sateesh Kumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-12-02

7.  A within-subject comparison of the conventional clasp-retained with attachment-retained removable partial dentures.

Authors:  Ahmed Y Alqutaibi
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-29

8.  The influence of removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of abutment and non-abutment teeth.

Authors:  Linda J Dula; Kujtim Sh Shala; Teuta Pustina-Krasniqi; Teuta Bicaj; Enis F Ahmedi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

9.  Clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures on the periodontal health of abutment teeth: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Linda J Dula; Enis F Ahmedi; Zana D Lila-Krasniqi; Kujtim Sh Shala
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-03-31

10.  The management of an endodontically abscessed tooth: patient health state utility, decision-tree and economic analysis.

Authors:  Ben Balevi; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.757

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.