Literature DB >> 7965615

Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: testing three explanations.

N M Malamuth1, L M Brown.   

Abstract

The authors tested three explanations of findings that sexually aggressive men perceive women's communications differently than less aggressive men. The first suggests that aggressors are incompetent in decoding women's negative emotions. The second posits that they fail to make subtle distinctions between women's friendliness and seductiveness and between assertiveness and hostility. The third explanation contends that sexual aggressors use a suspicious schema and therefore discount the veridicality of women's communications. These explanations were tested using videotaped scenarios in which a woman's responses to a man's advances were systematically varied. The data were most supportive of the suspicious schema explanation. These findings are integrated with other research on the characteristics of sexual aggressors and on the perceptions of aggressive children and of maritally violent men. Implications for interventions are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965615     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  Masculine gender roles associated with increased sexual risk and intimate partner violence perpetration among young adult men.

Authors:  M Christina Santana; Anita Raj; Michele R Decker; Ana La Marche; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Men's Coercive Condom Use Resistance: The Roles of Sexual Aggression History, Alcohol Intoxication, and Partner Condom Negotiation.

Authors:  Kelly Cue Davis; Natasha K Gulati; Elizabeth C Neilson; Cynthia A Stappenbeck
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2018-09

3.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTIONS OF SEXUAL INTENT: A QUALITATIVE REVIEW AND INTEGRATION.

Authors:  Kristen P Lindgren; Michele R Parkhill; William H George; Christian S Hendershot
Journal:  Psychol Women Q       Date:  2008-11-11

Review 4.  Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent.

Authors:  Coreen Farris; Teresa A Treat; Richard J Viken; Richard M McFall
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-03-15

5.  Individual Differences in Men's Misperception of Women's Sexual Intent: Application and Extension of the Confluence Model.

Authors:  Rhiana Wegner; Antonia Abbey
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2016-05-01

6.  Why do some men misperceive women's sexual intentions more frequently than others do? An application of the confluence model.

Authors:  Angela J Jacques-Tiura; Antonia Abbey; Michele R Parkhill; Tina Zawacki
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-08-24

7.  Gender inequitable masculinity and sexual entitlement in rape perpetration South Africa: findings of a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rachel Jewkes; Yandisa Sikweyiya; Robert Morrell; Kristin Dunkle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Emotional expression recognition and attribution bias among sexual and violent offenders: a signal detection analysis.

Authors:  Steven M Gillespie; Pia Rotshtein; Rose-Marie Satherley; Anthony R Beech; Ian J Mitchell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-07

9.  Understanding How University Students Use Perceptions of Consent, Wantedness, and Pleasure in Labeling Rape.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Megan Pleva; Elisabeth Seib; Terri Cole
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-07-08

10.  Using behavior-analytic implicit tests to assess sexual interests among normal and sex-offender populations.

Authors:  Bryan Roche; Anthony O'Reilly; Amanda Gavin; Maria R Ruiz; Gabriela Arancibia
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.