Literature DB >> 7965607

The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception.

J Krueger1, R W Clement.   

Abstract

Consensus bias is the overuse of self-related knowledge in estimating the prevalence of attributes in a population. The bias seems statistically appropriate (Dawes, 1989), but according to the egocentrism hypothesis, it merely mimics normative inductive reasoning. In Experiment 1, Ss made population estimates for agreement with each of 40 personality inventory statements. Even Ss who had been educated about the consensus bias, or had received feedback about actual consensus, or both showed the bias. In Experiment 2, Ss attributed bias to another person, but their own consensus estimates were more affected by their own response to the item than by the other person's response. In Experiment 3, there was bias even in the presence of unanimous information from 20 randomly chosen others. In all 3 experiments, Ss continued to show consensus bias despite the availability of other statistical information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965607     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  17 in total

1.  Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing.

Authors:  Diana I Tamir; Jason P Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Theory of mind: a neural prediction problem.

Authors:  Jorie Koster-Hale; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Demographically diverse crowds are typically not much wiser than homogeneous crowds.

Authors:  Stephanie de Oliveira; Richard E Nisbett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sorting through chickens and eggs: a longitudinal examination of the associations between attitudes, norms, and sexual risk behavior.

Authors:  David M Huebner; Torsten B Neilands; Gregory M Rebchook; Susan M Kegeles
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs.

Authors:  Nicholas Epley; Benjamin A Converse; Alexa Delbosc; George A Monteleone; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Do Older Adults Know Their Spouses' End-of-Life Treatment Preferences?

Authors:  Sara M Moorman; Robert M Hauser; Deborah Carr
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  2009

7.  Measuring the Prevalence of Problematic Respondent Behaviors among MTurk, Campus, and Community Participants.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Necka; Stephanie Cacioppo; Greg J Norman; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beliefs about Childhood Vaccination in the United States: Political Ideology, False Consensus, and the Illusion of Uniqueness.

Authors:  Mitchell Rabinowitz; Lauren Latella; Chadly Stern; John T Jost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is social projection based on simulation or theory? Why new methods are needed for differentiating.

Authors:  Claudia Bazinger; Anton Kühberger
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2012-12

10.  Comfort in big numbers: Does over-estimation of doping prevalence in others indicate self-involvement?

Authors:  Andrea Petróczi; Jason Mazanov; Tamás Nepusz; Susan H Backhouse; Declan P Naughton
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.646

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.