Literature DB >> 7965347

A 6-year follow-up study of oral function in shortened dental arches. Part II: Craniomandibular dysfunction and oral comfort.

D J Witter1, A F De Haan, A F Käyser, G M Van Rossum.   

Abstract

In this clinical 6-year follow-up study subjects with shortened dental arches (SDA, n = 55), characterized by the absence of molar support, are compared with subjects with complete dental arches (CDA, n = 52) with respect to items concerning craniomandibular dysfunction and oral comfort. In addition, a small group of subjects with SDA and removable partial dentures in the lower jaw (SDA + RPD, n = 19) is included in this study. Oral comfort is defined using the following criteria: (i) absence of pain and distress, meaning the absence of signs and symptoms of craniomandibular dysfunction: (ii) chewing ability; and (iii) appreciation of the appearance of the dentition in relation to absent posterior teeth. Additionally, complaints about the free-end RPD are described. It is concluded that: (i) a SDA (consisting of 3-5 occlusal units, OU) is not a risk factor for CMD and is able to provide long-term sufficient oral comfort; and (ii) free-end RPD (in the lower jaw) in SDA do not prevent CMD and do not improve oral function in terms of oral comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965347     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01150.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  11 in total

1.  Prevalence of temporomandibular disorder signs in patients with complete versus partial dentures.

Authors:  Osama A Al-Jabrah; Yousef R Al-Shumailan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Biological complications of removable dental prostheses in the moderately reduced dentition: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ovidiu Moldovan; Heike Rudolph; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Is the shortened dental arch still a satisfactory option?

Authors:  M Manola; F Hussain; B J Millar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Occlusion and Temporomandibular Function among Subjects with Mandibular Distal Extension Removable Partial Dentures.

Authors:  N H J Creugers; D J Witter; A Van 't Spijker; A E Gerritsen; C M Kreulen
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-07-05

5.  A study of dentists' preferences for the restoration of shortened dental arches with partial dentures.

Authors:  Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Shukran Ibraheem; Khaled Rateb Al-Hallak; Mohammed Othman Ali El Khalifa; Kusai Baroudi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Dental status, visits, and functional ability and dietary intake of elderly in Israel.

Authors:  L Natapov; D Kushnir; R Goldsmith; R Dichtiar; S P Zusman
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2018-12-10

7.  Strain Distribution in a Kennedy Class I Implant Assisted Removable Partial Denture under Various Loading Conditions.

Authors:  Reza Shahmiri; John M Aarts; Vincent Bennani; Raj Das; Michael V Swain
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-04-30

Review 8.  Reappraisal of the removable partial denture as a treatment option for the shortened dental arch.

Authors:  Mohammad Zakaria Nassani; Bassel Tarakji; Kusai Baroudi; Salah Sakka
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-04

Review 9.  Differences in functional outcomes for adult patients with prosthodontically-treated and -untreated shortened dental arches: a systematic review.

Authors:  Saadika Khan; Alfred Musekiwa; Usuf M E Chikte; Ridwaan Omar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dentists' Attitudes in Jordan towards the Shortened Dental Arch Concept: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Motasum Abu-Awwad; Rula Amarin; Farah Khouli; Sirin Shaban; Sandra AlTarawneh
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.