Literature DB >> 7965295

Plain radiographic interpretation in trimalleolar ankle fractures poorly assesses posterior fragment size.

J S Ferries1, T A DeCoster, K K Firoozbakhsh, J F Garcia, R A Miller.   

Abstract

Twenty-five patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures were evaluated using both conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT) to determine the size of the posterior fragment along with other fracture characteristics. Plain radiograph measurements indicated very poor inter- and intraexaminer reliability. When compared to the CT scan measurement, 54% of the plain radiographic readings revealed > 25% error. Plain radiographic interpretations erred in most cases by overrating the size of the fragment, but major underestimations also occurred. The larger size fragments showed more error than the smaller ones. This information confirms our clinical suspicion that the lateral radiograph is unreliable in assessing the posterior fragment size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7965295     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199408000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  16 in total

1.  A retrospective study of posterior malleolus fractures.

Authors:  Hai-lin Xu; Xuan Li; Dian-ying Zhang; Zhong-guo Fu; Tian-bing Wang; Pei-xun Zhang; Bao-guo Jiang; Hui-liang Shen; Gang Wang; Guang-lin Wang; Xin-bao Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Treatment of ankle fractures: operative techniques : Standards, tips and pitfalls].

Authors:  Konrad Kamin; Dmitri Notov; Christian Kleber; Onays Al-Sadi; Stefan Rammelt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Comparison of Posteromedial Versus Posterolateral Approach for Posterior Malleolus Fixation in Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Sheng Zhong; Lin Shen; Jia-Guo Zhao; Jie Chen; Jin-Feng Xie; Qi Shi; Ying-Hua Wu; Xian-Tie Zeng
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.071

Review 5.  Posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle.

Authors:  J Bartoníček; S Rammelt; M Tuček; O Naňka
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Interobserver variation in classification of malleolar fractures.

Authors:  S M Verhage; S J Rhemrev; S B Keizer; H M E Quarles van Ufford; J M Hoogendoorn
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Three-dimensional computed tomography mapping of posterior malleolar fractures.

Authors:  Qi-Hang Su; Juan Liu; Yan Zhang; Jun Tan; Mei-Jun Yan; Kai Zhu; Jin Zhang; Cong Li
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Principles of operative treatment of malleolar fractures today.

Authors:  P-M Sutter; J Peltzer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 9.  Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts.

Authors:  Francesco Pogliacomi; Massimo De Filippo; Daniele Casalini; Alberto Longhi; Fabrizio Tacci; Rocco Perotta; Francesco Pagnini; Silvio Tocco; Francesco Ceccarelli
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-18

10.  Anatomical factors affecting the selection of an operative approach for fibular fractures involving the posterior malleolus.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Xin Ma; Chao Zhang; Jiazhang Huang; Jianyuan Jiang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.