Literature DB >> 7964340

Mammographic screening: measurement of the cost in a population based programme in Victoria, Australia.

S F Hurley1, P M Livingston, N Thane, L Quang.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost per woman participating in a mammographic screening programme, and to describe methods for measuring costs.
DESIGN: Expenditure, resource usage, and throughput were monitored over a 12 month period. Unit costs for each phase of the screening process were estimated and linked with the probabilities of each screening outcome to obtain the cost per woman screened and the cost per breast cancer detected.
SETTING: A pilot, population based Australian programme offering free two-view mammographic screening. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5986 women aged 50-69 years who lived in the target area, were listed on the electoral roll, had no previous breast cancer, and attended the programme.
RESULTS: Unit costs for recruitment, screening, and recall mammography were $17.54, $60.04, and $175.54, respectively. The costs of clinical assessment for women with subsequent clear, benign, malignant (palpable), and malignant (impalpable) diagnoses were $173.71, $527.29, $436.62, and $567.22, respectively. The cost per woman screened was $117.70, and the cost per breast cancer detected was $11,550.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost per woman screened is a key variable in assessment of the cost effectiveness of mammographic screening, and is likely to vary between health care settings. Its measurement is justified if decisions about health care services are to be based on cost effectiveness criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964340      PMCID: PMC1059990          DOI: 10.1136/jech.48.4.391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  13 in total

Review 1.  The benefits and risks of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  S F Hurley; J M Kaldor
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Breast cancer screening and health service costs.

Authors:  H S Gravelle; P R Simpson; J Chamberlain
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Screening: the need for a population register.

Authors:  S F Hurley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-09-17       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

5.  Comparability of two methods of time and motion study used in a clinical setting: work sampling and continuous observation.

Authors:  P Wirth; L Kahn; G T Perkoff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  P J van der Maas; H J de Koning; B M van Ineveld; G J van Oortmarssen; J D Habbema; K T Lubbe; A T Geerts; H J Collette; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  A note on the cost-benefit problem in screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  D Kodlin
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  Cost-effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  R D Hull; J Hirsh; D L Sackett; G L Stoddart
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  The distinction between cost and charges.

Authors:  S A Finkler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Personal costs incurred by women attending a mammographic screening programme.

Authors:  S F Hurley; P M Livingston
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1991-01-21       Impact factor: 7.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.