Literature DB >> 7962624

Brains at necropsy: to fix or not to fix?

A Katelaris1, J Kencian, J Duflou, J M Hilton.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether routine formalin fixation of all brains coming to necropsy increases the rate of detection of brain abnormalities relative to either selective formalin fixation of brain tissue or fresh dissection of all brain tissue at the time of post mortem examination.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 300 medicolegal necropsies was performed. One hundred cases were examined by doctors with little or no formal training in necropsy pathology. One hundred cases were examined by forensic pathologists, who used their discretion as to whether to fix the brain in formalin. A further 100 cases were examined by neuropathologists; all the brains had already been fixed at the time of necropsy.
RESULTS: When examined by doctors with little or no formal necropsy pathology training, only 15% of brains were found to be abnormal. In the case of selective fixation, 33% were found to be abnormal. When there was obligatory fixation of all brains, 51% of all brains were found to be abnormal.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that formalin fixation of the whole brain at the time of necropsy, followed by detailed examination of the brain by a neuropathologist, significantly increases the detection rate of brain pathology at necropsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7962624      PMCID: PMC502144          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.47.8.718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  1 in total

1.  The postmortem diagnosis of diffuse cerebral injuries, with special reference to the importance of brain fixation.

Authors:  R H Simpson; S D Berson
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1987-01-10
  1 in total
  6 in total

1.  Rapid fixation of brains: a viable alternative?

Authors:  M Sharma; J H K Grieve
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Twenty-first century brain banking. Processing brains for research: the Columbia University methods.

Authors:  Jean Paul G Vonsattel; Maria Pilar Del Amaya; Christian E Keller
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 17.088

3.  Twenty-first century brain banking: practical prerequisites and lessons from the past: the experience of New York Brain Bank, Taub Institute, Columbia University.

Authors:  Jean Paul G Vonsattel; Maria del Pilar Amaya; Etty Paola Cortes; Katerina Mancevska; Christian E Keller
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Quantitative analysis of chondroitin sulfate disaccharides from human and rodent fixed brain tissue by electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kimberly M Alonge; Aric F Logsdon; Taylor A Murphree; William A Banks; C Dirk Keene; J Scott Edgar; Dale Whittington; Michael W Schwartz; Miklos Guttman
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.313

5.  Parallel gold enhancement of quantum dots 565/655 for double-labelling correlative light and electron microscopy on human autopsied samples.

Authors:  Miho Uematsu; Kyohei Mikami; Ayako Nakamura; Ryosuke Takahashi; Takanori Yokota; Katsuiku Hirokawa; Toshiki Uchihara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  International veterinary epilepsy task force recommendations for systematic sampling and processing of brains from epileptic dogs and cats.

Authors:  Kaspar Matiasek; Martí Pumarola I Batlle; Marco Rosati; Francisco Fernández-Flores; Andrea Fischer; Eva Wagner; Mette Berendt; Sofie F M Bhatti; Luisa De Risio; Robyn G Farquhar; Sam Long; Karen Muñana; Edward E Patterson; Akos Pakozdy; Jacques Penderis; Simon Platt; Michael Podell; Heidrun Potschka; Clare Rusbridge; Veronika M Stein; Andrea Tipold; Holger A Volk
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.