Literature DB >> 7959806

Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: realistic versus spherical model.

E Menninghaus1, B Lütkenhöner, S L Gonzalez.   

Abstract

The dependence of the neuromagnetic source localization accuracy on the volume conductor model was studied by the analysis of measured magnetic fields generated by tangentially oriented dipoles in a realistically shaped skull phantom. When using a homogeneous sphere model in the localization procedure, the errors were found to increase from about 3 mm to about 9 mm when the distance between the dipoles and the inner surface of the skull increased from 1 cm to 3 cm, whereas when using a true, realistic model in the inverse procedure the localization errors were only about 2-3 mm, independent of dipole depth. To account for the realistic geometry of the inner surface of the skull, the Boundary Element Method, based on a surface discretization in terms of about 300 triangles, proved to be sufficient. In addition to these analyses of experimental data, simulations were carried out to study the localization errors in the case of the spherical approximation for a dipole orientation changing from tangential to radial. For the latter orientation, errors of up to a few centimeters were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7959806     DOI: 10.1109/10.324531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  7 in total

1.  Fast realistic modeling in bioelectromagnetism using lead-field interpolation.

Authors:  B Yvert; A Crouzeix-Cheylus; J Pernier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.

Authors:  Arthur K Liu; Anders M Dale; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Evaluating the spatial relationship of event-related potential and functional MRI sources in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Kevin Whittingstall; Gerhard Stroink; Matthias Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neuromagnetic source analysis using magnetic resonance images for the construction of source and volume conductor model.

Authors:  B Lütkenhöner; E Menninghaus; O Steinsträter; C Wienbruch; H M Gissler; T Elbert
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Precision of dipole localization in a spherical volume conductor: a comparison of referential EEG, magnetoencephalography and scalp current density methods.

Authors:  A M Murro; J R Smith; D W King; Y D Park
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Electrical source localization by LORETA in patients with epilepsy: Confirmation by postoperative MRI.

Authors:  Gülsüm Akdeniz
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.383

7.  Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.

Authors:  Kevin Whittingstall; Gerhard Stroink; Larry Gates; J F Connolly; Allen Finley
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.