Literature DB >> 7957455

What is the better formulation of microencapsulated potassium chloride?

G Simoneau1, J F Bergmann, R Pamphile, C Caulin, J M Segrestaa.   

Abstract

A single blind cross-over study was performed comparing a new microencapsulated potassium chloride tablet (MET) with two reference formulations of oral potassium, namely potassium chloride solution (PS), and microencapsulated potassium chloride capsules (MEC), in 18 normal healthy volunteers. The potassium chloride induced change in gastric potential difference (PD) of the mucosa was the main criterion of comparison and was assessed by the area above curve (AAC), the total duration of the effect (TDE), the maximal variation of PD (delta MAX), and the aggression index (AI). The results showed that all three formulations induced a fall in PD; the delta MAX and AAC were significantly greater for PS indicating a higher aggressive effect of the solution; MET had significantly less aggressive effect than MEC when assessed by all parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7957455     DOI: 10.1007/BF03188825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  26 in total

1.  Persistent gastric-protective effect of antacid evaluated by measurement of transmucosal gastric potential difference.

Authors:  J F Bergmann; C Caulin; G Simoneau; G Dorf; J M Segrestaa
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Bioavailability of potassium from a slow-release tablet.

Authors:  D Ben-Ishay; K Engelman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1973 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Profile of gastric potential difference in man. Effects of aspirin, alcohol, bile, and endogenous acid.

Authors:  M G Geall; S F Phillips; W H Summerskill
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Permeability of the human gastric mucosa. Alteration by Acetylsalicylic acid and ethanol.

Authors:  B M Smith; J J Skillman; B G Edwards; W Silen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Gastric potential difference as a model in clinical pharmacology: assessment of gastric mucosal response to aspirin.

Authors:  H Laule; P W Lücker; P Altmayer; M A Eldon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  The comparative bioavailability of liquid, wax-matrix, and microencapsulated preparations of potassium chloride.

Authors:  V A Skoutakis; S R Acchiardo; N J Wojciechowski; C A Carter; A P Melikian; A N Chremos
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  A gastroscopic and pharmacological study of the disintegration time and absorption of pivampicillin capsules and tablets.

Authors:  H Hey; P Matzen; J T Andersen; E Didriksen; B Nielsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Severe hypokalemia in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  D H Lawson; D A Henry; J M Lowe; J M Gray; H G Morgan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1979-09

9.  Acute effect of systemic aspirin on gastric mucosa in man.

Authors:  K J Ivey; D B Paone; W J Krause
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Gastroscopic localization of a microencapsulated KCl preparation in the human stomach.

Authors:  D Y Graham; J L Smith; R D Jones; A Rakhit; V Tipnis; M E Hurley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Adverse drug events related to dosage forms and delivery systems.

Authors:  I F Uchegbu; A T Florence
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.