Literature DB >> 7957297

Reliability of radiographical measurements of spondylolisthesis and extension-flexion radiographs of the lumbar spine.

K Tallroth1, M Ylikoski, M Landtman, S Santavirta.   

Abstract

We studied the reliability of extension-flexion radiography by analysing intra-observer and inter-observer variations in measurements of 30 patients with established L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. The highest intra-observer angular variations among three radiologists were found at the L5-S1 level (mean 1.6 degrees, S.D. 1.6 degrees, max. 9 degrees) and the highest sagittal translation also at the L5-S1 level (mean 0.6 mm, S.D. 0.8 mm, max. 4 mm). The highest angular inter-observer variation was found at the L5-S1 level (mean 2.6 degrees, S.D. 2.3 degrees, max. 11 degrees) while the highest variation in sagittal translatory movement was found at the L4-L5 level (mean 1.4 mm, S.D. 1.2 mm, max. 6 mm). The mean intra-observer variation for L5 olisthesis was 1.0 mm (S.D. 0.9 mm, max. 5 mm) and the corresponding inter-observer variation 1.3 mm (S.D. 1.1 mm, max. 6 mm). Thus, in general, the overall consistency and concordance were good. The variations in intra-observer and inter-observer readings were similar. Variability in readings did not depend on the magnitude or abnormality of the readings. On the other hand, variability may occur because of difficulty in defining the exact landmarks used for the measurements. We point out that in certain cases the diagnostic value of one single reading of an extension-flexion radiography examination may be questionable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7957297     DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(94)90341-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Katrin Knecht; Gordana Balaban; Jiri Dvorak; Dieter Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Direct repair for treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: no benefit in comparison to segmental fusion after a mean follow-up of 14.8 years.

Authors:  Dietrich Schlenzka; Ville Remes; Ilkka Helenius; Tommi Lamberg; Pekka Tervahartiala; Timo Yrjönen; Kaj Tallroth; Kalevi Osterman; Seppo Seitsalo; Mikko Poussa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Alexander Brunner; Markus Gühring; Traude Schmälzle; Kuno Weise; Andreas Badke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Lumbar segmental mobility disorders: comparison of two methods of defining abnormal displacement kinematics in a cohort of patients with non-specific mechanical low back pain.

Authors:  J Haxby Abbott; Julie M Fritz; Brendan McCane; Barry Shultz; Peter Herbison; Brett Lyons; Georgia Stefanko; Richard M Walsh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Decompression without Fusion for Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.