Literature DB >> 7956579

Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system.

J M Jorge1, Y K Yang, S D Wexner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A study was undertaken to assess the incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidocele as a finding during cinedefecography.
METHODS: All patients who underwent cinedefecography between July 1988 and July 1992 were prospectively evaluated. Clinical data were assessed by a standardized questionnaire. Sigmoidocele was classified based on the degree of descent of the lowest portion of the sigmoid: 1 degree = above the pubococcygeal line; 2 degrees = below the pubococcygeal line and above the ischiococcygeal line; 3 degrees = below the ischiococcygeal line. This classification was then correlated with the patient's symptoms and percentage of redundancy relative to rectal length.
RESULTS: Twenty-four sigmoidoceles (5.2 percent) were noted in 463 cinedefecographic studies; 289 of these patients had constipation. These five males and 19 females were of a mean age of 57 (range, 20-77) years. Nine patients had 1 degree sigmoidocele, seven had 2 degrees, and eight had 3 degrees. Percentage of sigmoid redundancy was 51 percent, 65 percent, and 88 percent for 1 degree, 2 degrees, and 3 degrees, respectively (P = 0.0001). Impaired rectal emptying was present in 16 patients (67 percent). Five of eight patients with 3 degrees sigmoidocele underwent colonic resection with or without rectopexy. The other three patients were conservatively managed. One of seven patients with 2 degrees sigmoidocele underwent colectomy, and the other six were conservatively managed as were all nine patients with 1 degree. Posttreatment improvement was noted in 100 percent (6 of 6) of patients operated on but in only 33 percent (6 of 18) of patients conservatively treated. Thus, this proposed classification system yielded excellent correlation among the mean of level of the sigmoidocele, percentage of redundancy, and clinical symptoms. Furthermore, clinical significance of 3 degrees sigmoidocele is supported by the fact that all five of 3 degrees patients who underwent colonic resection reported symptomatic improvement at a mean follow-up of 23 (range, 15-39) months.
CONCLUSION: Sigmoidocele may account for symptoms of obstructed defecation, and, therefore, it must be considered in the differential diagnosis and evaluation of constipation. Staging of sigmoidocele is useful in determining both clinical significance and optimal treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956579     DOI: 10.1007/BF02049813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Differential diagnosis in descending perineum syndrome].

Authors:  O Schwandner; F Poschenrieder; H-B Gehl; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Marat Khaikin; Steven-D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function.

Authors:  M A Kahn; S L Stanton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

Review 4.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; John H Pemberton; G Richard Locke
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Pelvic outlet obstruction.

Authors:  Orit Kaidar-Person; Seth A Rosen; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

6.  The evaluation of constipation.

Authors:  Matthew D Vrees; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

7.  [Obstructed defecation].

Authors:  H-P Bruch; F Fischer; T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy.

Authors:  T Laubert; M Kleemann; U J Roblick; C Bürk; P Hildebrand; J Lewejohann; E Schlöricke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part II: treatment).

Authors:  Antonio Bove; Massimo Bellini; Edda Battaglia; Renato Bocchini; Dario Gambaccini; Vincenzo Bove; Filippo Pucciani; Donato Francesco Altomare; Giuseppe Dodi; Guido Sciaudone; Ezio Falletto; Vittorio Piloni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with non-diverticular disease.

Authors:  O Schwandner; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.