Literature DB >> 7956268

Patient perception of a long-term clinical trial: experience using a close-out questionnaire in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trial. SOLVD Close-out Working Group.

M J Henzlova1, G H Blackburn, E J Bradley, W J Rogers.   

Abstract

A close-out questionnaire was distributed to the participants in a long-term heart failure trial, Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). The respondents' primary motivation for enrollment, positive and negative experiences, and reported changes in habitual behavior was analyzed. Seventy-four percent (N = 3522) of the eligible patients responded to the survey. The most commonly cited reason for enrollment was recommendation by the primary physician. A wish "to contribute to medical science" and "to help others" was also a frequent incentive. A majority of the respondents were satisfied with participation and would be willing to participate in a future clinical trial. Most negative experiences included transportation to and from the clinic and frequent staff changes. A significant number of the patients reported changes in their smoking habits, alcohol intake, and diet despite the absence of behavioral interventions in the study protocol. There were minor differences between attitudes and perceptions of the male and female participants. No differences were found between patients who had previously participated in a clinical trial and those who had not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956268     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  12 in total

Review 1.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

2.  Lessons from a patient experience survey in a randomized surgical trial of treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Philippe E Zimmern; Kimberly J Dandreo; Larry Sirls; Alice Howell; Lynn Hall; Judy Gruss; Kathy Jesse; Tamara Dickinson; Caren Prather
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Featherstone; J L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

4.  Understanding motivations to participate in an observational research study: Why do patients enroll?

Authors:  Michael C Soule; Eleanor E Beale; Laura Suarez; Scott R Beach; Carol A Mastromauro; Christopher M Celano; Shannon V Moore; Jeff C Huffman
Journal:  Soc Work Health Care       Date:  2016-03-02

5.  Knowledge and attitudes regarding medical research studies among patients with breast cancer and gynecological diseases.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Thomas Hildebrandt; Sandra-Maria Knetzger; Michael G Schrauder; Sebastian M Jud; Alexander Hein; Claudia Rauh; Peter A Fasching; Matthias W Beckmann; Falk C Thiel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Factors influencing women's decision to participate or not in a surgical randomised controlled trial for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Alyaa Mostafa; James N'Dow; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Factors affecting patient participation in orthopaedic trials comparing surgery to non-surgical interventions.

Authors:  Rajat Mittal; Ian A Harris; Sam Adie; Justine M Naylor
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-05-13

Review 8.  Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials.

Authors:  Claire Planner; Peter Bower; Ailsa Donnelly; K Gillies; Katrina Turner; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Disappointment and adherence among parents of newborns allocated to the control group: a qualitative study of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sandra Meinich Petersen; Vibeke Zoffmann; Jesper Kjærgaard; Lone Graff Stensballe; Lone Graff Steensballe; Gorm Greisen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Assessment of clinical trial participant patient satisfaction: a call to action.

Authors:  Bethann Mangel Pflugeisen; Stacie Rebar; Anne Reedy; Roslyn Pierce; Paul J Amoroso
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.