Literature DB >> 7956112

A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validity.

S Barker1, N Barron, B H McFarland, D A Bigelow.   

Abstract

The authors describe the development, reliability testing, and validation of a 17-item instrument that measures the level of functioning of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers. The instrument provides a measure of the consumer's severity of disability which can, in turn, be used to: (a) describe an agency's "case mix" of clients; (b) measure consumer progress; (c) assign clients to different levels of service; and (d) assist payors in determining reimbursement. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is aimed specifically at persons with chronic mental illness, is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population, and is quick and easy to complete. The scale's reliability and validity have been examined in detail. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability are good. Criterion variables such as length of psychiatric hospitalization and clinicians' global ratings correlated highly with scale scores. Finally, the instrument predicts subsequent state and local hospital admissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956112     DOI: 10.1007/BF02207489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Ment Health J        ISSN: 0010-3853


  30 in total

1.  Development and validation of a level-of-care instrument for predicting residential placement.

Authors:  H B Kramer; O T Massey; L J Pokorny
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1990-04

2.  Measurement and reliability: statistical thinking considerations.

Authors:  J J Bartko
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Psychiatric severity of illness. A case mix study.

Authors:  S D Horn; A F Chambers; P D Sharkey; R A Horn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Measuring program outcomes in Tucson.

Authors:  L L Bachrach
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1987-11

6.  Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally ill.

Authors:  R S Green; E J Gracely
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1987

7.  Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: the Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR).

Authors:  R H Ellis; N Z Wilson; F M Foster
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1984

8.  The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situations.

Authors:  R J Dworkin; L C Friedman; R L Telschow; K D Grant; H S Moffic; V J Sloan
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1990-08

9.  Hospital financial performance under the prospective payment system by type of admission: psychiatric versus medical/surgical.

Authors:  M P Freiman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Team use of the Global Assessment Scale for inpatient planning and evaluation.

Authors:  T L Kuhlman; V A Sincaban; M J Bernstein
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1990-04
View more
  69 in total

1.  Statewide replication of predictive validation for the Multnomah Community Ability Scale.

Authors:  B Zani; B McFarland; M Wachal; S Barker; N Barron
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1999-06

2.  Determinants of anti-psychotic medication compliance in a multicultural population.

Authors:  S J Ziguras; S Klimidis; T J Lambert; A C Jackson
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2001-06

3.  Symptom severity and personal functioning among patients with schizophrenia discharged from long-term hospital care into the community.

Authors:  T Trauer
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2001-04

4.  A test of the reliability and validity of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale.

Authors:  M Hendryx; D G Dyck; D McBride; J Whitbeck
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2001-04

5.  Utility of functioning measures in the prediction of independent living status in older adults with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Karen L Fortuna; Matthew C Lohman; Martha L Bruce; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.485

6.  An expanded version of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale: anchors and interview probes for the assessment of adults with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Faith B Dickerson; Andrea E Origoni; Andrea Pater; Barrie K Friedman; William M Kordonski
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2003-04

7.  Longitudinal relationships between neurocognition, theory of mind, and community functioning in outpatients with serious mental illness.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Cook; Nancy H Liu; Melissa Tarasenko; Charlie A Davidson; William D Spaulding
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.254

8.  Clinical characteristics and objective living conditions in relation to quality of life among community-based individuals of schizophrenia in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Frederick Ka Ching Yeung; Sunny Ho Wan Chan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Costs of services for homeless people with mental illness in 5 Canadian cities: a large prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Eric A Latimer; Daniel Rabouin; Zhirong Cao; Angela Ly; Guido Powell; Tim Aubry; Jino Distasio; Stephen W Hwang; Julian M Somers; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Scott Veldhuizen; Erica E M Moodie; Alain Lesage; Paula N Goering
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-07-18

10.  Fidelity and outcomes in six integrated dual disorders treatment programs.

Authors:  Daniel W Chandler
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.