Literature DB >> 7955888

An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound.

J A Bates1, R M Conlon, H C Irving.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound, 1046 consecutive non-obstetric ultrasound scans performed by sonographers were audited. In 94% of cases, the report prepared by the sonographer gave an accurate account of the findings. In 6.3% of reports the radiologist provided additional comments, whilst in only 0.7% of cases was the sonographer's report significantly altered. In the 630 patients in whom adequate follow-up data was available, there was a single instance of a false positive ultrasound finding but no other significant ultrasound inaccuracy. This audit indicates that the local arrangements for involving sonographers in a non-obstetric ultrasound service has resulted in agreed standards being met. It is suggested that sonographers can and should be involved more widely in the provision of non-obstetric ultrasound services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7955888     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81878-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  3 in total

1.  Image and report quality in non-obstetric ultrasound examinations undertaken by sonographers: Results of an audit of 3731 cases.

Authors:  Simon Freeman; Peter Cantin; Catherine Gutteridge; Petra Williams; Sarah Hamilton; QiQi Lam; Paul Dubbins
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-08-12

2.  Do radiologists need to review abdominal ultrasound examinations reported as 'normal' by the sonographer?

Authors:  Martin Necas; Yi Shen; Qi Hao Ong; Kara Prout; Wendy Wackrow
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-02-28

3.  Audit: sonographic report correlation against surgical findings during elective shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Vincent Gallagher; Jamie Buchanan; Justin Harris; Carol McCrum
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-08-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.