Literature DB >> 7954244

White matter changes are correlated significantly with radiation dose. Observations from a randomized dose-escalation trial for malignant glioma (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-02).

B W Corn1, D M Yousem, C B Scott, M Rotman, S O Asbell, D F Nelson, L Martin, W J Curran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A Phase I/II randomized dose-seeking trial was performed to document the severity, time course, and significance of white matter changes seen on serial imaging scans (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography) associated with bis-chlorethyl nitrosourea (BCNU) and hyperfractionated cranial irradiation.
METHODS: Long term survivors (> or = 18 months) were identified from a prospective randomized dose-escalation Phase I/II trial designed to evaluate twice-daily radiotherapy for supratentorial high grade malignant gliomas. All scans were reviewed by a neuroradiologist who had no information about the prescribed dose and fractionation. In the trial, patients were assigned to receive 64.8 Gy, 72.0 Gy, 76.8 Gy, or 81.4 Gy (all fractionated as 1.2 Gy twice a day [bid]), or 48.0 Gy or 54.4 Gy (both in 1.6-Gy bid fractions). Bis-chlorethyl nitrosourea was administered every 8 weeks for 1 year. Of 747 randomized patients, 177 had analyzable scans. The scans reviewed were those acquired preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after radiotherapy. Radiographic endpoints included no white matter change (Grade 0), minimal patchy white matter foci (Grade 1), start of confluence of white matter disease (Grade 2), large confluent areas (Grade 3), confluence with cortical/subcortical involvement (Grade 4), leukoencephalopathy (Grade 5), and possible necrosis (Grade 6) according to the classification of F. Fazekas et al. The effects were scored relative to the baseline preoperative scans. The dose pairs of 48 Gy and 54.4 Gy, 64.8 Gy and 72 Gy, and 76.8 Gy and 81.4 Gy were grouped together for analysis (low, intermediate, and high dose, respectively). Toxicity was analyzed in three ways: Grade 2 or worse, Grade 3 or worse, and Grade 6.
RESULTS: Grade 2 or worse changes were observed in 26.6, 27.6, and 40.4% of patients in the low, intermediate, and high dose groups, respectively. Grade 3 or worse changes were observed in 8.3, 20.0, and 36.5% of patients in the low, intermediate, and high dose groups, respectively. Grade 6 changes were observed in 1.6, 4.6, and 19.2% of patients in the low, intermediate, and high dose groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed among treatment groups when toxicity was evaluated as Grade 2 or worse. For toxicity of Grade 3 or worse, an chi-square test revealed P values of 0.04 (low vs. intermediate dose), 0.09 (intermediate vs. high dose), and 0.0005 (low vs. high dose). With the endpoint of possible necrosis (Grade 6), P values were 0.21 (low vs. intermediate dose), 0.05 (intermediate vs. high dose), and 0.003 (low vs. high dose). The median time to radiographic appearance of an effect (15 months) was not influenced by total dose or fraction size.
CONCLUSIONS: A well described toxicity scale for white matter injury was applied successfully to patients with malignant glioma treated with definitive irradiation. Severe white matter changes continued to increase significantly as the total dose of hyperfractionated cranial irradiation was escalated. The time to onset of the white matter abnormalities appeared to be independent of dose. An ongoing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study will allow correlation of white matter injury with prospective neuropsychometric testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7954244     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941115)74:10<2828::aid-cncr2820741014>3.0.co;2-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Phase II study of Ginkgo biloba in irradiated brain tumor patients: effect on cognitive function, quality of life, and mood.

Authors:  Albert Attia; Stephen R Rapp; L Doug Case; Ralph D'Agostino; Glenn Lesser; Michelle Naughton; Kevin McMullen; Robin Rosdhal; Edward G Shaw
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  [Neurological complications of neurooncological therapy].

Authors:  U Herrlinger; J P Steinbach
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain.

Authors:  Yaacov Richard Lawrence; X Allen Li; Issam el Naqa; Carol A Hahn; Lawrence B Marks; Thomas E Merchant; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Serial diffusion tensor imaging to characterize radiation-induced changes in normal-appearing white matter following radiotherapy in patients with adult low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Mohammad Haris; Shaleen Kumar; Mani Karthick Raj; Koilpillai Joseph Maria Das; Shantanu Sapru; Sanjay Behari; Ram Kishore Singh Rathore; Ponnada A Narayana; Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-04

5.  Computer-based assessment of cognitive functions in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Klaus Fliessbach; Sabine Rogowski; Christian Hoppe; Michael Sabel; Mathias Goeppert; Christoph Helmstaedter; Pasquale Calabrese; Gabriele Schackert; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Matthias Simon; Uwe Schlegel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  A novel nitroxide is an effective brain redox imaging contrast agent and in vivo radioprotector.

Authors:  Ryan M Davis; Anastasia L Sowers; William DeGraff; Marcelino Bernardo; Angela Thetford; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.376

7.  Temozolomide and 13-cis retinoic acid in patients with anaplastic gliomas: a prospective single-arm monocentric phase-II study (RNOP-05).

Authors:  Oliver Grauer; Christina Pascher; Christian Hartmann; Florian Zeman; Michael Weller; Martin Proescholdt; Alexander Brawanski; Thorsten Pietsch; Wolfgang Wick; Ulrich Bogdahn; Peter Hau
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Initial experience with bevacizumab treatment for biopsy confirmed cerebral radiation necrosis.

Authors:  Roy Torcuator; Richard Zuniga; Yedathore S Mohan; Jack Rock; Thomas Doyle; Joseph Anderson; Jorge Gutierrez; Samuel Ryu; Rajan Jain; Mark Rosenblum; Tom Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Incidence of radiation-induced leukoencephalopathy after whole brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  C Conill; J Berenguer; M Vargas; A López-Soriano; I Valduvieco; J Marruecos; R Vilella
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 10.  A critical review of the clinical effects of therapeutic irradiation damage to the brain: the roots of controversy.

Authors:  Carol L Armstrong; Kunsang Gyato; Abdel W Awadalla; Robert Lustig; Zelig A Tochner
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.