Literature DB >> 7953912

Cell culture assays for chemicals with tumor-promoting or tumor-inhibiting activity based on the modulation of intercellular communication.

I V Budunova1, G M Williams.   

Abstract

The ability of chemicals with tumor-promoting or tumor-inhibiting activity to modulate gap junctional intercellular communication is reviewed. The two most extensively used types of assays for screening tests are (1) metabolic cooperation assays involving exchange between cells of precursors of nucleic acid synthesis and (2) dye-transfer assays that measure exchange of fluorescent dye from loaded cells to adjacent cells. About 300 substances of different biological activities have been studied using various assays. For tumor promoters/epigenetic carcinogens, metabolic cooperation assays have a sensitivity of 62% and dye-transfer assays 60%. Thirty percent of DNA-reactive carcinogens also possess the ability to uncouple cells. The complete estimation of the predictive power of these assays could not be made because the majority of the substances studied for intercellular communication effects in vitro have not yet been studied for promoting activity in vivo. Both metabolic cooperation assays and dye transfer assays respond well to the following classes of substances: phorbol esters, organochlorine pesticides, polybrominated biphenyls, promoters for urinary bladder, some biological toxins, peroxisome proliferators, and some complex mixtures. Results of in vitro assays for such tumor promoters/nongenotoxic carcinogens, such as some bile acids, some peroxides, alkanes, some hormones, mineral dusts, ascorbic acid, okadaic acid, and benz(e)pyrene, do not correlate with the data of in vivo two-stage or complete carcinogenesis. Enhancement of intercellular communication was found for 18 chemicals. Among these, cAMP, retinoids, and carotenoids have demonstrated inhibition of carcinogenesis. We examine a number of factors that are important for routine screening, including the requirement for biotransformation for some agents to exert effects on gap junctions. We also discuss the mechanisms of tumor promoter and tumor inhibitor effects on gap junctional permeability, including influences of protein kinase activation, changes in proton and Ca2+ intracellular concentrations, and effects of oxy radical production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7953912     DOI: 10.1007/BF00756491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol        ISSN: 0742-2091            Impact factor:   6.691


  226 in total

1.  Dieldrin inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication in rat glial cells as measured by the fluorescence photobleaching and scrape loading/dye transfer assays.

Authors:  S Suter; J E Trosko; M H el-Fouly; L R Lockwood; A Koestner
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1987-11

Review 2.  Chemoprevention of cancer.

Authors:  L W Wattenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Activation of calcium-activated, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase C) by new classes of tumor promoters: teleocidin and debromoaplysiatoxin.

Authors:  H Fujiki; Y Tanaka; R Miyake; U Kikkawa; Y Nishizuka; T Sugimura
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1984-04-30       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Effects of various chemicals including bile acids and chemical carcinogens on the inhibition of metabolic cooperation.

Authors:  K Noda; M Umeda; T Ono
Journal:  Gan       Date:  1981-10

5.  Kinetics of phenobarbital inhibition of intercellular communication in mouse hepatocytes.

Authors:  R J Ruch; J E Klaunig
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Promotion of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary tumorigenesis by high dietary fat in the rat: possible role of intercellular communication.

Authors:  C F Aylsworth; C Jone; J E Trosko; J Meites; C W Welsch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Interaction between quercetin, TPA and DDT in the V79 metabolic cooperation assay.

Authors:  L Wärngård; S Flodström; S Ljungquist; U G Ahlborg
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Comparative metabolism and genotoxicity of the structurally similar nitrophenylenediamine dyes, HC Blue 1 and HC Blue 2, in mouse hepatocytes.

Authors:  F W Kari; S M Driscoll; A Abu-Shakra; S C Strom; W L Jenkins; J S Volosin; K M Rudo; R Langenbach
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.691

9.  Diminution of mouse epidermal superoxide dismutase and catalase activities by tumor promoters.

Authors:  V Solanki; R S Rana; T J Slaga
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Incorporation of n-3 fatty acids into WB-F344 cell phospholipids inhibits gap junctional intercellular communication.

Authors:  C M Hasler; J E Trosko; M R Bennink
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.880

View more
  14 in total

1.  Inhibition of intercellular communication by condensates of high and low tar cigarettes.

Authors:  O Vang; H Wallin; H Autrup
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 2.  Brain Disorders and Chemical Pollutants: A Gap Junction Link?

Authors:  Marc Mesnil; Norah Defamie; Christian Naus; Denis Sarrouilhe
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-12-31

Review 3.  The role of connexin-mediated cell-cell communication in breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  G D Carystinos; A Bier; G Batist
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Protective effect of the natural product, chaetoglobosin K, on lindane- and dieldrin-induced changes in astroglia: identification of activated signaling pathways.

Authors:  Tatyana S Sidorova; Diane F Matesic
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Models and methods for in vitro testing of hepatic gap junctional communication.

Authors:  Michaël Maes; Sara Crespo Yanguas; Joost Willebrords; Mathieu Vinken
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Involvement of gap junction channels in the pathophysiology of migraine with aura.

Authors:  Denis Sarrouilhe; Catherine Dejean; Marc Mesnil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Gap junction-mediated transfer of miR-145-5p from microvascular endothelial cells to colon cancer cells inhibits angiogenesis.

Authors:  Dominique Thuringer; Gaetan Jego; Kevin Berthenet; Arlette Hammann; Eric Solary; Carmen Garrido
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 8.  Possible Mechanisms of Mercury Toxicity and Cancer Promotion: Involvement of Gap Junction Intercellular Communications and Inflammatory Cytokines.

Authors:  Roberto Zefferino; Claudia Piccoli; Nunzia Ricciardi; Rosella Scrima; Nazzareno Capitanio
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Bioavailability and efficacy of a gap junction enhancer (PQ7) in a mouse mammary tumor model.

Authors:  Stephanie N Shishido; Keshar Prasain; Amanda Beck; Thi D T Nguyen; Duy H Hua; Thu Annelise Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modulated gap junctional intercellular communication as a biomarker of PAH epigenetic toxicity: structure-function relationship.

Authors:  B L Upham; L M Weis; J E Trosko
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.