Literature DB >> 7953588

Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation.

S M Kosslyn1, N M Alpert, W L Thompson, C F Chabris, S L Rauch, A K Anderson.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography scans were acquired when subjects performed three tasks, each in a separate block of trials. They decided whether words named pictures of objects viewed from a canonical perspective, decided whether words named pictures of objects viewed from a non-canonical (unusual) perspective or saw random patterns of lines and pressed a pedal when they heard the word (this was a baseline condition). The dorsolateral prefrontal region was activated when subjects identified objects seen from non-canonical perspectives, as expected if the frontal lobes are involved in top-down perceptual processing. In addition, several areas in the occipital, temporal and parietal lobes were selectively activated when subjects identified objects seen from non-canonical perspectives, as specifically predicted by a recent theory. Overall, the pattern of results supported the view that the human brain identifies objects by using a system of areas similar to that suggested by studies of other primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7953588     DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.5.1055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  30 in total

Review 1.  If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Updating working memory for words: a PET activation study.

Authors:  C R Clark; G F Egan; A C McFarlane; P Morris; D Weber; C Sonkkilla; J Marcina; H J Tochon-Danguy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Modeling of activation data in the BrainMap database: detection of outliers.

Authors:  Finn Arup Nielsen; Lars Kai Hansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  I. Longitudinal changes in aging brain function.

Authors:  L L Beason-Held; M A Kraut; S M Resnick
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: Role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Compensatory neural activity distinguishes different patterns of normal cognitive aging.

Authors:  Jenna L Riis; Hyemi Chong; Katherine K Ryan; David A Wolk; Dorene M Rentz; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Cognitive status impacts age-related changes in attention to novel and target events in normal adults.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Hyemi Chong; Jenna Riis; Dorene M Rentz; David A Wolk; Andrew E Budson; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The timing of temporoparietal and frontal activations during mental own body transformations from different visuospatial perspectives.

Authors:  Lars Schwabe; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Parietal contributions to recollection: electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Jon S Simons; Joshua D McKeever; Polly V Peers; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Cabeza; E Tulving
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.