Literature DB >> 7953585

A comparison of the influences of body and environment centred reference frames on neglect.

M Mennemeier1, A Chatterjee, K M Heilman.   

Abstract

Extrapersonal space can be defined by coordinate systems, or frames of reference, that are centred on the body (viewer) or on the environment. Although these frames are identical in the upright position, when the body is placed in positions orthogonal to gravity, the frames may be dissociable. We compared the influences of environmental and body-centred frames on line bisection in two patients with neglect who, when upright, neglected opposite dimensions of space. Through certain combinations of line placement and body orientation, the body and environmental frames were brought into opposition, and each frame predicted line bisection errors in an opposite direction. When the patients were positioned so that predictions of the two frames contrasted, both bisected lines as predicted by the environmental rather than the body-centred frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7953585     DOI: 10.1093/brain/117.5.1013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  8 in total

1.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Do supine position and deprivation of visual environment influence spatial neglect?

Authors:  Sahawanatou Gassama; Antoine Deplancke; Arnaud Saj; Jacques Honoré; Marc Rousseaux
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  A case study of new assessment and training of unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients: effect of visual image transformation and visual stimulation by using a Head Mounted Display system (HMD).

Authors:  Toshiaki Tanaka; Tohru Ifukube; Shunichi Sugihara; Takashi Izumi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect.

Authors:  N Beschin; R Cubelli; S Della Sala; L Spinazzola
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke.

Authors:  I V Bonan; K Hubeaux; M C Gellez-Leman; J P Guichard; E Vicaut; A P Yelnik
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Neglect of radial and vertical space: importance of the retinotopic reference frame.

Authors:  J C Adair; D J Williamson; D H Jacobs; D L Na; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Motor extinction in distinct reference frames: a double dissociation.

Authors:  Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Mikolaj Pawlak; Edward H Herskovits; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Lydia A Trupe; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect.

Authors:  D L Na; J C Adair; D J Williamson; R L Schwartz; B Haws; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.