Literature DB >> 7953218

General practitioners' views of clinical guidelines for the management of asthma.

D Armstrong1, J Fry, P Armstrong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the views of GPs on the value of clinical guidelines for the management of asthma.
DESIGN: Structured questionnaire survey.
SETTING: Bromley Health District.
SUBJECTS: All (160) GPs in health district. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of each item of clinical guidelines as to whether 'obvious', 'useful' or 'controversial'.
RESULTS: Ninety-four (59%) of GPs responded. There was considerable variation in views on all 26 guideline items in the questionnaire. The average GP thought that 11.5 items were obvious, 8.5 useful and 5.7 controversial, but these views showed no relationship to the GP's age, sex, ethnicity or partnership size.
CONCLUSION: Clinical guidelines are usually written to be of value to a wide number of clinicians, but it appears that GPs at least have more individual needs on issues of clinical management. This may explain the reported limited impact of guidelines on clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7953218     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/6.2.199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  4 in total

1.  Using marketing principles for healthcare development.

Authors:  E Dickinson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

2.  Is there a demand among general practitioners for inner city community hospitals?

Authors:  S A Hull; I Jones
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-09

3.  Some reservations about clinical guidelines.

Authors:  A Hopkins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Automated application of clinical practice guidelines for asthma management.

Authors:  A R Ertle; E M Campbell; W R Hersh
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1996
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.