P Lelliott1, J Wing. 1. Research Unit, Royal College of Psychiatrists, London.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This second report of a national audit of new long-stay (NLS) psychiatric patients describes the services caring for the patients and the reasons why patients were still in hospital. METHOD: Data analyses addressed the prevalence of NLS patients, the residential resources available to services, the distributions of patients within services, clinicians' views as to the appropriateness of current placement and the reasons for any inappropriate placements. RESULTS: The average point prevalence was 6.1 per 100,000 population; it was significantly lower in England and Wales (5.6, s.d. = 3.2) than in Scotland and Northern Ireland (10.7, s.d. = 6.4, ANOVA F ratio = 10.9, P < 0.01). The estimated rate of accumulation was 1.3 per 100,000 population per year. Many English services had very few non-acute psychiatric beds and 31% of English NLS patients, despite their protracted lengths of stay, were housed on acute wards. Assessors thought that 61% of patients would be better placed in a non-hospital setting; 47% were thought to require a community-based residential setting, and of these over one-half were still in hospital because no suitable community placement was available. CONCLUSIONS: Many NLS patients remain in hospital because their residential needs are not met by existing community provision.
BACKGROUND: This second report of a national audit of new long-stay (NLS) psychiatricpatients describes the services caring for the patients and the reasons why patients were still in hospital. METHOD: Data analyses addressed the prevalence of NLSpatients, the residential resources available to services, the distributions of patients within services, clinicians' views as to the appropriateness of current placement and the reasons for any inappropriate placements. RESULTS: The average point prevalence was 6.1 per 100,000 population; it was significantly lower in England and Wales (5.6, s.d. = 3.2) than in Scotland and Northern Ireland (10.7, s.d. = 6.4, ANOVA F ratio = 10.9, P < 0.01). The estimated rate of accumulation was 1.3 per 100,000 population per year. Many English services had very few non-acute psychiatric beds and 31% of English NLSpatients, despite their protracted lengths of stay, were housed on acute wards. Assessors thought that 61% of patients would be better placed in a non-hospital setting; 47% were thought to require a community-based residential setting, and of these over one-half were still in hospital because no suitable community placement was available. CONCLUSIONS: Many NLSpatients remain in hospital because their residential needs are not met by existing community provision.
Authors: Michael P Fitzgerald; Sally G Mitton; Aimee Protheroe; Michael Roughton; Richard Driscoll; Ian D R Arnott; Richard K Russell Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2012-08-18
Authors: Antonella Gigantesco; Giovanni de Girolamo; Giovanni Santone; Rossella Miglio; Angelo Picardi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-08-22 Impact factor: 3.295