Literature DB >> 7952820

Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery.

P N Blondeel1, W D Boeckx.   

Abstract

Besides the enormous advantages of reconstructing the amputated breast by means of a conventional TRAM flap, the main disadvantage remains the elevation of small (free TRAM) or larger (pedicled TRAM) parts of the rectus abdominis muscle. In order to overcome this disadvantage, the free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) skin flap has recently been used for breast mound reconstruction with excellent clinical results. After achieving favorable results with eight unilateral DIEP-flaps, we were challenged by an abdomen with a midline laparotomy scar. By dissecting a bilateral DIEP flap and making adjacent anastomoses to the internal mammary artery we were able to achieve sufficient flap mobility for easy free flap positioning and breast shaping. Intraoperative segmental nerve stimulation, postoperative functional abdominal wall tests and CT-scan examination showed normal abdominal muscle activity. On the basis of a case report, the technical considerations and advantages of anastomosing the bipedicled DIEP flap to the internal mammary artery are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7952820     DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(94)90033-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  20 in total

1.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Perforator flaps: a microsurgical innovation.

Authors:  Steven Morris
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-11-21

3.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

4.  Comparative analysis of fluorescent angiography, computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography for planning autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael P Chae; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren Matthew Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 5.  [The reconstructive sequence in the 21st century. A reconstructive clockwork].

Authors:  K Knobloch; P M Vogt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Choice of flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Masahiro Tachi; Atsushi Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Quantitative regression analysis of the cutaneous vascular territories in a rat model.

Authors:  Youlun Tao; Siwang Hu; Koonhei W Lui; Shaohe Chen; Maolin Tang; Shixin Chen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  [Abdominal hernias resulting from abdominal flap harvest].

Authors:  G Germann; M Sauerbier; F Unglaub
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

10.  Autologous microvascular breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Claragh Healy; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.