Literature DB >> 7951336

Predictive parameters in biologic assessment of low-stage retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection.

P Albers1, W deRiese, E B Walker, T M Ulbright, W N Crabtree, T Reister, R S Foster, J P Donohue.   

Abstract

In all, 30% of patients felt to have clinical stage A nonseminomatous testis cancer in fact have pathologic stage B disease. Although patients with clinical stage A nonseminoma currently enjoy a very high change for cure, a better assignment of therapy at diagnosis could lead to an overall decrease in the morbidity of treatment. This study analyzed orchiectomy specimens from 102 patients with clinical stage A nonseminomatous testis cancer, all of whom underwent pathologic staging via retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND). Various parameters of the orchiectomy specimen were analyzed to determine whether or not clinical staging could be improved on the basis of these factors. Statistical analysis resulted in the following model. If the orchiectomy specimen consisted of 100% embryonal carcinoma the patient was classified as being at high risk for retroperitoneal metastasis. In the absence of this finding the aneuploid cell line as determined by flow cytometry was considered. If the percentage of aneuploid cells in the S phase was less than 29% the patient was felt to be at low risk for retroperitoneal metastasis. If this percentage was greater than 29% the patient was classified as being at high risk. Using this paradigm, 77% of pathologic stage A patients and 91% of pathologic stage B patients were correctly classified. The test efficiency was 82%. This pilot study resulted in an interesting model that should be tested prospectively in consecutive patients to determine whether it is clinically useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7951336     DOI: 10.1007/BF00192266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  10 in total

Review 1.  Flow cytometry using paraffin-embedded tissue: five years on.

Authors:  D W Hedley
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1989-05

Review 2.  Ki-67 and other proliferation markers useful for immunohistological diagnostic and prognostic evaluations in human malignancies.

Authors:  J Gerdes
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Orchidectomy alone in testicular stage I non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours.

Authors:  M J Peckham; A Barrett; J E Husband; W F Hendry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Significance of aneuploid stemlines in testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

Authors:  W E de Graaff; D T Sleijfer; B de Jong; A Dam; H Schraffordt Koops; J W Oosterhuis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Flow cytometric and quantitative histological parameters to predict occult disease in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  J W Moul; J P Foley; C L Hitchcock; W F McCarthy; I A Sesterhenn; R L Becker; J L Griffin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Medical Research Council prospective study of surveillance for stage I testicular teratoma. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumors Working Party.

Authors:  G Read; S P Stenning; M H Cullen; M C Parkinson; A Horwich; S B Kaye; P A Cook
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy.

Authors:  A Böcking; C P Adler; H H Common; M Hilgarth; B Granzen; W Auffermann
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol       Date:  1984-03

8.  Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in clinical stage A non-seminomatous germ cell testis cancer. Review of the Indiana University experience 1965-1989.

Authors:  J P Donohue; J A Thornhill; R S Foster; R G Rowland; R Bihrle
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1993-03

9.  Relation of proliferative activity to survival in patients with advanced germ cell cancer.

Authors:  G W Sledge; J N Eble; B J Roth; B P Wuhrman; N Fineberg; L H Einhorn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Prognostic significance of S-phase fraction in good-risk, node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  G M Clark; M C Mathieu; M A Owens; L G Dressler; L Eudey; D C Tormey; C K Osborne; K W Gilchrist; E G Mansour; M D Abeloff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 44.544

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Whole-body FDG-PET in patients with stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours.

Authors:  U Lassen; G Daugaard; A Eigtved; L Højgaard; K Damgaard; M Rørth
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.