Literature DB >> 7950879

Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits.

A Ungersböck1, O Pohler, S M Perren.   

Abstract

Recently, a dominant influence of the surface roughness parameters for the soft tissue reaction at the implant tissue interface was found in an experimental study on sheep. The purpose of the present study is to correlate the surface roughness parameters of different experimental bone plates to the results of the histomorphometric analyses of the adjacent soft tissues. Pure titanium plates (35 x 5 x 1 mm) with six different surface treatments and electropolished stainless steel plates were tested. Prior to implantation the surface roughness parameters were determined using a profilometer and a scanning electron microscope. The tibia of adult rabbits served as test sites. At least four plates of each type were implanted. Three months postoperatively the implants were harvested with an intact tissue envelope and were left in situ for the histological preparation. The difference in the roughness parameters is statistically significant for most surface conditions and has an effect on the soft tissue reaction. The histological evaluation shows a significant higher number of blood vessels for steel plates in comparison to titanium plates with handground and blasted surface conditions. For the rough type of anodized titanium surfaces a significantly thinner soft tissue capsule is found, compared to electropolished steel plates. For the steel plates a fluid film was found between the implant and the adjacent tissue layer. The material and the surface roughness of the implant, determine the tissue reaction at the interface. The rough type of anodized titanium implants seems to be preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7950879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  7 in total

1.  On the formation of fibrous capsule and fluid space around machined and porous blood plasma clot coated titanium.

Authors:  E Jansson; M Källtorp; A Johansson; P Tengvall; P Thomsen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction.

Authors:  David Mok; Lucie Lessard; Carlos Cordoba; Patrick G Harris; Andreas Nikolis
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

3.  Percutaneous implants with porous titanium dermal barriers: an in vivo evaluation of infection risk.

Authors:  Dorthyann Isackson; Lawrence D McGill; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials.

Authors:  Vygandas Rutkunas; Virginija Bukelskiene; Vaidotas Sabaliauskas; Evaldas Balciunas; Mangirdas Malinauskas; Daiva Baltriukiene
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Tissue engineering scaffold material of porous nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide 66.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Hongyan Lu; Jingchao Zhang; Guoyu Lu; Zhennan Deng; Anchun Mo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-05-13

6.  Bone Regeneration in Critical-Sized Bone Defects Treated with Additively Manufactured Porous Metallic Biomaterials: The Effects of Inelastic Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Marianne Koolen; Saber Amin Yavari; Karel Lietaert; Ruben Wauthle; Amir A Zadpoor; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Biocompatibility issues with modern implants in bone - a review for clinical orthopedics.

Authors:  Katja M R Nuss; Brigitte von Rechenberg
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2008-04-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.