Literature DB >> 7950829

Digital subtraction angiography in potential live-kidney donors: a study of 1000 cases.

A A Shokeir1, T A el-Diasty, A Nabeeh, A A Shaaban, M el-Kenawy, E W Wafa, M A Ghoneim.   

Abstract

Intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IV-DSA) combined with excretory urography (IVU) were utilized to study the renal anatomy of 1000 potential live-kidney donors. In the entire series, 712 donors (71.2%) had bilateral single renal arteries, whereas 255 (25.5%) had unilateral multiple, 26 (2.6%) had bilateral multiple, and 7 (0.7%) had unilateral hypoplastic or absent renal arteries determined by IV-DSA. Major renal abnormalities that might be potentially significant for safe renal donation were detected in 76 donors (7.6%) by combined IV-DSA and IVU studies. In 10% of the potential donors, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) was required because of the equivocal results of IV-DSA. Of the 1000 potential donors, 700 underwent nephrectomy and the number of renal arteries at nephrectomy was compared with both IV-DSA and IA-DSA reports. Analysis of data revealed a sensitivity of 96% vs 95%, a specificity of 57% vs 75% and an overall accuracy 93% vs 90% for IV-DSA and IA-DSA, respectively, both IV-DSA and IA-DSA were accurate enough in identification of single renal arteries. However, the accuracy of IA-DSA was better than that of IV-DSA in visualization of double (84% vs 64%) and triple (66% vs 33%) renal arteries. It is concluded that IV-DSA combined with IVU is an effective technique for the evaluation of potential kidney donors. In cases where IV-DSA is equivocal, we recommend confirming IA-DSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7950829     DOI: 10.1007/BF00206941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  19 in total

1.  Optimal technique of renal arteriography in living renal transplant donors.

Authors:  G D Strauser; D P Stables; R Weil
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Renal artery imaging: a prospective comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.

Authors:  D Kim; D H Porter; R Brown; M S Crivello; P Silva; B W Leeming
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  Digital subtraction angiography for noninvasive imaging of the renal artery.

Authors:  A Zabbo; A C Novick
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.

Authors:  R A Clark; E S Alexander
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Digital subtraction angiography: current status and use of intra-arterial injection.

Authors:  A B Crummy; M F Stieghorst; P A Turski; C M Strother; R P Lieberman; J F Sackett; W D Turnipseed; D E Detmer; C A Mistretta
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Use of digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of living related renal transplant donors.

Authors:  S M Flechner; E N Rauschkolb; G Cohen; C M Sandler; Y Ben-Menachem; C T Van Buren; W D Payne; B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  A prospective analysis of the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of digital subtraction angiography for living-related renal donor evaluation.

Authors:  J McElroy; A C Novick; S B Streem; D Steinmuller; B Risius; C Buszta; D Steinhilber
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  100 living-related kidney donor evaluations using digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  S M Flechner; C M Sandler; G K Houston; C T Van Buren; M I Lorber; B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Digital subtraction angiography for renal donor evaluation.

Authors:  W H Cho; S C Jacobs; R K Lawson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of potential renal donors.

Authors:  S K Sussman; J L Weinerth; S D Braun; M Saeed; F F Illescas; R H Cohan; G E Newman; L M Perlmutt; N R Dunnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  3-D Spiral Computerised Tomographic Angiography in Evaluation of Potential Renal Donors.

Authors:  A Alam; B N Chander; D P Joshi
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  Prospective Evaluation of the Accuracy of MDCT Angiography for Living Kidney Donor.

Authors:  Myung Up Kim; Kyung Hwa Choi; Seung Choul Yang; Young Taik Oh; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-02-21

3.  Comparison between helical computed tomography angiography and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Abijit Shetty; Kishore Thekhe Adiyat
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2014-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.