Literature DB >> 7949957

A framework for "Need to Know" authorizations in medical computer systems: responding to the constitutional requirements.

V M Brannigan1.   

Abstract

"Need to Know" systems which restrict access to computerized data to those with a specified need for the data have been described as part of the solution to the problem of privacy in health care information systems. However, no operational "need to know" system is described in the medical literature. Recent legal developments in constitutional privacy protection make a "need to know" system mandatory, not optional. In sophisticated information systems users can utilize the unique characteristics of the system itself to implement a high level "need to know" system, based on the institution's own patient treatment pattern. This article provides an analytical tool for helping to define a "need to know" system with reference to the specific problems of health care institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7949957      PMCID: PMC2247951     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  8 in total

1.  Computerized patient information under the Privacy Act: a regulatory effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  V M Brannigan
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

2.  Medical informatics. The revolution in law, technology, and medicine.

Authors:  V M Brannigan; R E Dayhoff
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  1986-03

3.  Information management and patient privacy in the NHS.

Authors:  A Tonks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-11-13

4.  Health information, privacy, confidentiality and ethics.

Authors:  E H Kluge
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1994-02

5.  Privacy and security of personal information in a new health care system.

Authors:  L O Gostin; J Turek-Brezina; M Powers; R Kozloff; R Faden; D D Steinauer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Protection of patient data in multi-institutional medical computer networks: regulatory effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  V M Brannigan
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1993

7.  Patient privacy: a consumer protection approach.

Authors:  V M Brannigan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  The need for security--a clinical view.

Authors:  F H France; P N Gaunt
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1994-02
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Development of CPR security using impact analysis.

Authors:  J Salazar-Kish; D Tate; P D Hall; K Homa
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records.

Authors:  R C Barrows; P D Clayton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Design of access control methods for protecting the confidentiality of patient information in networked systems.

Authors:  J W Bowen; J C Klimczak; M Ruiz; M Barnes
Journal:  Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp       Date:  1997
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.