Literature DB >> 7949951

A decision-support system for the analysis of clinical practice patterns.

E A Balas1, Z R Li, J A Mitchell, D C Spencer, E Brent, B G Ewigman.   

Abstract

Several studies documented substantial variation in medical practice patterns, but physicians often do not have adequate information on the cumulative clinical and financial effects of their decisions. The purpose of developing an expert system for the analysis of clinical practice patterns was to assist providers in analyzing and improving the process and outcome of patient care. The developed QFES (Quality Feedback Expert System) helps users in the definition and evaluation of measurable quality improvement objectives. Based on objectives and actual clinical data, several measures can be calculated (utilization of procedures, annualized cost effect of using a particular procedure, and expected utilization based on peer-comparison and case-mix adjustment). The quality management rules help to detect important discrepancies among members of the selected provider group and compare performance with objectives. The system incorporates a variety of data and knowledge bases: (i) clinical data on actual practice patterns, (ii) frames of quality parameters derived from clinical practice guidelines, and (iii) rules of quality management for data analysis. An analysis of practice patterns of 12 family physicians in the management of urinary tract infections illustrates the use of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7949951      PMCID: PMC2247889     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care        ISSN: 0195-4210


  5 in total

Review 1.  Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians.

Authors:  J Lomas; G M Anderson; K Domnick-Pierre; E Vayda; M W Enkin; W J Hannah
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Improving drug prescribing in primary care: a critical analysis of the experimental literature.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; T J McLaughlin; J Avorn
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Peer review: impact of a system based on billing claims.

Authors:  C R Buck; K L White
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Management of urinary tract infections in adults.

Authors:  W E Stamm; T M Hooton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.