Literature DB >> 7949306

Differences in circadian photosensitivity between retinally degenerate CBA/J mice (rd/rd) and normal CBA/N mice (+/+).

T Yoshimura1, M Nishio, M Goto, S Ebihara.   

Abstract

Using the magnitude of phase shift of circadian locomotor rhythms induced by a single pulse of white fluorescent light, we compared the sensitivity of the circadian system to light in retinally degenerate mice and in normal mice. In the first experiment, phase response curves (PRCs) for 10-lux white light were generated in CBA/J mice with retinal degeneration (rd/rd) and CBA/N mice with normal retinas (+/+). Although large phase delays early in the subjective night and small phase advances in the late subjective night were observed in CBA/N mice, CBA/J mice showed only small phase delays early in the subjective night. In the second experiment, we found that the magnitude of phase shifts at circadian time (CT) 16 for delays and CT 24 for advances in CBA/J mice became larger with increasing light intensity, and that CBA/J mice could show the same amount of phase shift as CBA/N mice when higher intensities were used. These findings indicate that the differences in the shapes of PRCs are not due to differences in the nature of the oscillating system, but to differences in circadian photosensitivity between these strains. Because the genetic background for the rd loci was not completely identical in the CBA/N and CBA/J mice, it was possible that genes other than the rd gene might have caused different photosensitivity in these mice. Therefore, in the last experiment, we studied the circadian photosensitivity in F1 hybrids between CBA/N and CBA/J mice and in the backcross progeny with different genotypes (+/rd and rd/rd) obtained from the crossing between F1 hybrids between CBA/N and CBA/J mice and in the backcross progeny with different genotypes (+/rd and rd/rd) obtained from the crossing between F1 and CBA/J mice. In these mice with heterogeneous genetic backgrounds as well, mice with retinal degeneration were always less sensitive to light, suggesting that reduced circadian photosensitivity is caused by retinal degeneration. These results are discussed in relation to recent findings in retinally degenerate C57BL mice, which have been found to have normal circadian sensitivity to light.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7949306     DOI: 10.1177/074873049400900105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  12 in total

Review 1.  The regulation of circadian clocks by light in fruitflies and mice.

Authors:  R G Foster; C Helfrich-Förster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Contribution of classic photoreceptors to entrainment.

Authors:  N Mrosovsky
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors mediating phase-shifts of circadian rhythms in retinally degenerate CBA/J (rd/rd) and normal CBA/N (+/+)mice.

Authors:  T Yoshimura; S Ebihara
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Mice with early retinal degeneration show differences in neuropeptide expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus.

Authors:  Linda Ruggiero; Charles N Allen; R Lane Brown; David W Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.759

5.  The development of melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells in mice with early retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Linda Ruggiero; Charles N Allen; R Lane Brown; David W Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 6.  Embryonic development of circadian clocks in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei.

Authors:  Dominic Landgraf; Christiane E Koch; Henrik Oster
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.856

7.  Effects of Cage Position and Light Transmission on Home Cage Activity and Circadian Entrainment in Mice.

Authors:  Laura C E Steel; Selma Tir; Shu K E Tam; James N Bussell; Manuel Spitschan; Russell G Foster; Stuart N Peirson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Targeted destruction of photosensitive retinal ganglion cells with a saporin conjugate alters the effects of light on mouse circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Didem Göz; Keith Studholme; Douglas A Lappi; Mark D Rollag; Ignacio Provencio; Lawrence P Morin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies.

Authors:  David Baker; Katie Lidster; Ana Sottomayor; Sandra Amor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 10.  Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age.

Authors:  Robert J Lucas; Stuart N Peirson; David M Berson; Timothy M Brown; Howard M Cooper; Charles A Czeisler; Mariana G Figueiro; Paul D Gamlin; Steven W Lockley; John B O'Hagan; Luke L A Price; Ignacio Provencio; Debra J Skene; George C Brainard
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.