Literature DB >> 7948758

Which cervical sampler? A comparison of four methods.

K S Metcalf1, J Sutton, M D Moloney, L A Brown, K R Peel, A Baines.   

Abstract

Four cytology sampling methods were compared in 1063 patients referred for colposcopy with a recent abnormal smear. A dyskaryotic smear of any grade was considered a positive result, though comparisons were limited to cases with a subsequent biopsy confirming CINII or III. There were no differences between the abilities of any of the four methods to detect higher grades of CIN (chi (2)3 = 4.603, P > 0.20). The presence or absence of endocervical cells in a smear was not significantly associated with any variation in success rate (chi (2)1 = 0.959, P > 0.30). The joint analysis of the four methods and the presence/absence of endocervical cells also showed no significant effects (chi (2)7 = 12.768, 0.1 > P > 0.05). In the latter analysis the trend towards a conventional level of significance was accounted for by the Aylesbury spatula giving a relatively high success rate when endocervical cells were present. The suggestion of advantage for the Aylesbury spatula merits further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7948758     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1994.tb00423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  1 in total

1.  Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studies.

Authors:  F Buntinx; M Brouwers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.