Literature DB >> 7948349

Physical properties of self locking and conventional surgical knots.

L A Israelsson1, T Jonsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess some of the physical properties of three types of self locking knots and two types of conventional surgical knots.
DESIGN: Experimental in vitro study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Knot efficiency (knot strength: suture strength ratio), slippage, and volume. MATERIALS: Test knots tied with the suture materials polyglactin, polydioxanone and nylon in USP sizes 1,2/0, and 4/0.
RESULTS: Self locking knots performed significantly better (p < 0.01) than conventional knots in all combinations of material and size, except for 4/0 nylon. Efficiency of the self locking knots tied with the monofilament polydioxanone and nylon ranged from 0.88-0.96. With the multifilament polyglactin, it ranged from 0.71-0.90, and it increased proportionally with the thickness of the material. The mean efficiency of the conventional knots was 0.51 (0.06) for polyglactin, and 0.70 (0.17) for the monofilament materials. The self locking knots did not slip. The conventional starting knot often slipped partly, but came undone only when the conventional terminating knot was tied with monofilament material. The self locking knots were significantly smaller than the conventional knots.
CONCLUSION: Self locking knots are safer than conventional surgical knots, and considerably smaller.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7948349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches.

Authors:  D Millbourn; Y Cengiz; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Locking, jamming, and ratchet mechanisms of sliding surgical knots topologically revisited.

Authors:  J Joris Hage; Lydia P E van der Steen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Editorial: Ten Commandments of Safe and Optimum Abdominal Wall Closure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 4.  Closing midline abdominal incisions.

Authors:  Leif A Israelsson; Daniel Millbourn
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Suture to wound length ratio in abdominal wall closure: how well are we doing?

Authors:  Z F Williams; P Tenzel; W B Hooks; W W Hope
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.739

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.