Literature DB >> 7945141

Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities.

K Hugdahl1, H Nordby.   

Abstract

Reaction time (RT) is usually speeded and slowed to correctly and incorrectly cued target stimuli, respectively, in experiments on attention shift (Posner, 1988). When targets occur in a spatial location different from the cue, shifting attention from the cued location to the target location involves interrupt of ongoing activity, move attention to the new location, and reengage attention. The present study investigated whether the cognitive operations involved in cued vs uncued attentional shifts also were detectable in the event-related potentials (ERPs). Two experiments are reported, one with visual and one with auditory stimuli. In the visual modality, the cue and target were a lit-up square and an asterisk, respectively, shown on a computer screen. In the auditory modality, the cue was a tone in either the left or right ear, followed by the target noise in either the same or the opposite ear. The results from the visual experiment showed shorter RTs to correctly cued (Valid) targets and longer RTs to incorrectly cued (Invalid) targets. Invalidly cued targets elicited enhanced P3 amplitudes, with a frontocentral distribution. Reduced P3 amplitudes were observed on Valid trials, largest reduction for parietooccipital leads. The auditory experiment showed P3 enhancement frontally and reduced amplitudes at temporal and parietal leads. No RT differences were seen to Valid and Invalid trials. The existence of an anterior attention system involved in interrupt and disengage of attention, and a posterior attention facilitation system related to cue presentation is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7945141     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(05)80055-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neural Biol        ISSN: 0163-1047


  11 in total

1.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Contributions of the dopaminergic system to voluntary and automatic orienting of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  S Yamaguchi; S Kobayashi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cortical activity during cued picture naming predicts individual differences in stuttering frequency.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Event-related potentials reveal temporal staging of dynamic facial expression and gaze shift effects on attentional orienting.

Authors:  Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Joseph B Hopfinger; Reiko Graham; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Attentional biases in children of depressed mothers: An event-related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Brandon E Gibb; Seth D Pollak; Greg Hajcak; Max Owens
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-09-29

6.  Gender differences in interhemisphere interactions during distributed and directed attention.

Authors:  O M Razumnikova; N V Vol'f
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06

7.  ERP evidence for spatial attention being directed away from disgusting locations.

Authors:  Ulrike Zimmer; Marie-Theres Keppel; Christian Poglitsch; Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Michael J Seay; Danielle R Charney; John L Holmes; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Independent effects of bottom-up temporal expectancy and top-down spatial attention. An audiovisual study using rhythmic cueing.

Authors:  Alexander Jones
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06

10.  The functional anatomy of attention: a DCM study.

Authors:  Harriet R Brown; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.