Literature DB >> 7944553

Sublethal concentrations of mercury in river otters: monitoring environmental contamination.

R S Halbrook1, J H Jenkins, P B Bush, N D Seabolt.   

Abstract

Hair, muscle, and liver mercury concentrations were determined in river otter (Lutra canadensis) carcasses collected from the lower coastal plain and piedmont of Georgia. Mean muscle and hair mercury concentrations were greater (P < 0.001) in otters from the lower coastal plain (4.42 and 24.25 mg/kg wet wt, respectively) compared to otters from the piedmont (1.48 and 15.24 mg/kg, respectively). Liver tissue from lower coastal plain otters averaged 7.53 mg/kg mercury. Mean fetus brain and muscle mercury concentrations were 1.03 and 1.58 mg/kg wet wt, respectively, and fetal muscle mercury concentrations were correlated (r = 0.92) with maternal muscle mercury concentrations. Comparison of mercury concentrations found in Georgia otters to those associated with adverse effects in otter and mink (Mustela vison), indicate sublethal contamination with concentrations in some individuals approaching that observed in experimentally dosed individuals that developed clinical signs of mercurialism. Mercury concentrations in fish from the lower coastal plain approached or exceeded concentrations demonstrated to be toxic to experimentally dosed otters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7944553     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  10 in total

1.  Mercury levels in Georgia otter, mink and freshwater fish.

Authors:  P M Cumbie
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Age determination, by use of the baculum, in the river otter, Lutra c. canadensis Schreber.

Authors:  C E FRILEY
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  1949-05       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Mercury, cadmium, and lead in British otters.

Authors:  C F Mason; N I Last; S M Macdonald
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Cesium-137 levels detected in Georgia otters.

Authors:  R S Halbrook; J H Jenkins
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Effects of dietary mercury on mink.

Authors:  R J Aulerich; R K Ringer; S Iwamoto
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Reproductive capability of male rats and mice treated with methyl mercury.

Authors:  K S Khera
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Mercury pollution of Lake Erie ecosphere.

Authors:  K K Pillay; C C Thomas; J A Sondel; C M Hyche
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Subtle consequences of methylmercury exposure: behavioral deviations in offspring of treated mothers.

Authors:  J M Spyker; S B Sparber; A M Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-08-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mercury and Mink. II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication.

Authors:  G Wobeser; N O Nielsen; B Schiefer
Journal:  Can J Comp Med       Date:  1976-01

10.  Mercury poisoning in a wild mink.

Authors:  G Wobeser; M Swift
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.535

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Hepatic mercury, cadmium, and lead in mink and otter from New York State: monitoring environmental contamination.

Authors:  David T Mayack
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Mercury levels in mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) from northeastern North America.

Authors:  David E Yates; David T Mayack; Kenneth Munney; David C Evers; Andrew Major; Taranjit Kaur; Robert J Taylor
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Contaminant concentrations in Illinois mink and otter.

Authors:  R S Halbrook; A Woolf; G F Hubert; S Ross; W E Braselton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Noninvasive heavy metal pollution assessment by means of Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus) hair from Galicia (NW Spain): a comparison with invasive samples.

Authors:  David Hernández-Moreno; Irene de la Casa Resino; Luis E Fidalgo; Luis Llaneza; Francisco Soler Rodríguez; Marcos Pérez-López; Ana López-Beceiro
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Environmental contaminants in male river otters from Oregon and Washington, USA, 1994-1999.

Authors:  Robert A Grove; Charles J Henny
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Mercury in various tissues of three mustelid species and other trace metals in liver of European otter from Eastern Finland.

Authors:  M Lodenius; U Skarén; P Hellstedt; E Tulisalo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Accumulation of heavy metals and As in liver, hair, femur, and lung of Persian jird (Meriones persicus) in Darreh Zereshk copper mine, Iran.

Authors:  Manoochehr Khazaee; Amir Hossein Hamidian; Afshin Alizadeh Shabani; Sohrab Ashrafi; Seyyed Ali Ashghar Mirjalili; Esmat Esmaeilzadeh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  A Review of Pathogens, Diseases, and Contaminants of Muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) in North America.

Authors:  Laken S Ganoe; Justin D Brown; Michael J Yabsley; Matthew J Lovallo; W David Walter
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-15

9.  Environmental contaminants in freshwater fish and their risk to piscivorous wildlife based on a national monitoring program.

Authors:  Jo Ellen Hinck; Christopher J Schmitt; Kimberly A Chojnacki; Donald E Tillitt
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  The use of chemical markers for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink populations.

Authors:  Marcin Brzeziński; Andrzej Zalewski; Agnieszka Niemczynowicz; Ingeborga Jarzyna; Małgorzata Suska-Malawska
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.